[uclibc-ng-devel] [PATCH] ARC: Enable getpt() support in ARC defconfigs
Alexey Brodkin
Alexey.Brodkin at synopsys.com
Wed Mar 1 13:30:31 PST 2017
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 21:25 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 18:25:35 +0000, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
>
> >
> > That means for building of our toolchain we'll need to have
> > separately stored "defconfigs" in some form. Let's see what Anton says on that :)
> >
> > And regardless of what mr Anton says having off-the-tree defconfigs is not the best idea
> > because with time options will go in and out and occasionally we'll have outdated
> > defconfigs.
>
> What would they be off-tree?
>
> What I meant is that when you look at the per architecture defconfigs,
> they are also all exactly the same, except for the TARGET_<foo> option.
>
> So instead of having this big duplication, my suggestion is to get rid
> of architecture-specific defconfig, and just have a few
> architecture-independent defconfig, addressing common use cases (such
> as "minimal" and "feature full").
That was exactly my understanding :)
Speaking of "defconfigs" I really meant something that we may use
for building our toolchain outside of Buildroot if we want something that
differs from uClibc's defaults/defconfig - and most probably we'll need something
either to add to uClibc's minimal_defconfig or exclude from _maximal_defconfig.
Otherwise how may we be in control of libc in our "reference" toolchain?
-Alexey
More information about the linux-snps-arc
mailing list