[PATCH v2 0/4] Use build registers for getting numbers of interrupts

[Yuriy Kolerov]

Hi Vineet,

I have checked reworked patches. I think it is fine.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vineet Gupta [mailto:vgupta at synopsys.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 11:58 PM
> To: Yuriy Kolerov <yuriy.kolerov at synopsys.com>; linux-snps-
> arc at lists.infradead.org
> Cc: Alexey.Brodkin at synopsys.com; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Use build registers for getting numbers of
> interrupts
> 
> On 01/31/2017 03:45 AM, Yuriy Kolerov wrote:
> > A summary:
> >
> >   * Use build registers for getting numbers of interrupts both for
> >     core interrupt controller and for IDU interrupt controller.
> >   * Set a default priority for all core interrupt to prevent
> >     unexpected switching of banks of registers.
> >   * Remove option for setting number of interrupts since it does
> >     not affect a number of interrupts in IRQ domains and breaks
> >     portability since it is impossible to change size of table of
> >     interrupts after linkage.
> >
> > Change in v2:
> >
> >   * Squash some commits.
> >   * Do not move a structure for control register of core intc to
> >     the header since it is used only once.
> >
> > Yuriy Kolerov (4):
> >   ARCv2: IRQ: Move structure for build register of core intc to the
> >     header
> >   ARCv2: IRQ: Remove option for setting number of interrupts
> >   ARCv2: IRQ: Use build registers for getting numbers of interrupts
> >   ARCv2: IRQ: Set a default priority for all core interrupts
> >
> >  arch/arc/Kconfig               | 11 -----------
> >  arch/arc/include/asm/arcregs.h | 11 +++++++++++
> >  arch/arc/include/asm/irq.h     | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  arch/arc/kernel/entry-arcv2.S  |  3 ++-
> >  arch/arc/kernel/intc-arcv2.c   | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >  arch/arc/kernel/mcip.c         | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
> >  include/soc/arc/mcip.h         | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >  7 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> Hi Yuriy,
> 
> I've reworked your series a bit and pushed to my for-next.
> 
> Care to take a look please.
> 
> Thx,
> -Vineet