Build regressions/improvements in v4.9-rc1
Vineet Gupta
Vineet.Gupta1 at synopsys.com
Mon Oct 17 09:59:24 PDT 2016
+CC Arnd, Michal
Hi Geert, Arnd
Need some guidance here.
On 10/17/2016 12:34 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> 48 error regressions:
>> > + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h: Error: bad instruction `llockd r2,[r0]': => 476
>> > + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h: Error: bad instruction `llockd r2,[r13]': => 475
[snip...]
>> > + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h: Error: bad instruction `scondd r4,[r8]': => 516
>> > + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h: Error: bad instruction `scondd r6,[r3]': => 478
> arcv2/axs103_smp_defconfig
I'm thinking how to address this correctly.
This is due to the older version of compiler. The fix itself is trivial - add an
"call as-instr" construct in Makefile to get -DARC_TOOLS_SUPPORT_LLOCKD
However the atomic64 API variant (CONFIG_GENERIC_ATOMIC64 or arch native) which
gets included in build comes from Kconfig (ISA supports them or not). How do we
tie the Makefile info into the Kconfig.
We could trigger a build failure for invalid combinations of GENERIC_ATOMIC64 and
ARC_TOOLS_SUPPORT_LLOCKD but that would be less than ideal out of box experience.
Or the simpler solution is that kisskb upgrades the ARC GNU compiler ;-)
-Vineet
More information about the linux-snps-arc
mailing list