[RFC 2/2] perf/core: change errno for sampling event not supported in hardware
Vince Weaver
vincent.weaver at maine.edu
Tue May 10 20:33:13 PDT 2016
On Mon, 9 May 2016, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Monday 09 May 2016 07:24 PM, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 May 2016, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> >
> >> This allows userspace to identify this case specifically from the
> >> catch all error msg it prints currently.
> >>
> >> This is an ABI change
> >
> > An ABI change which will probably break things.
>
>
> Right thats what I feared. But hold on, I don't think we need to change the ABI to
> achieve what we want. Gosh why did I even take that path.
>
> Currently the errno switch case in perf_evsel__open_strerror() in doesn't handle
> ENOTSUPP. So how about we add that - augmented with the same sample_period !0
> check to barf for lack of sampling support.
>
> Do you see anything wrong with that ?
no, but it would be nice if one of the actual maintainers would chime in
with an opinion.
In any case if ENOTSUPP is being returned to userspace I should update the
perf_event manpage to reflect that.
Vince
More information about the linux-snps-arc
mailing list