[PATCH v3 04/11] ARM: bcm2835: dt: add bindings for shared interrupt properties
mark.rutland at arm.com
Thu Mar 10 00:57:18 PST 2016
As a general note, please put DT bindings patches before any patches
implementing them, as per
That makes it possible to review a series in-order.
On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 10:52:15AM +0000, kernel at martin.sperl.org wrote:
> From: Martin Sperl <kernel at martin.sperl.org>
> Add binding documentation for the new shared interrupt properties:
> * brcm,dma-channel-shared-mask
> * brcm,dma-shared-irq-index
> Signed-off-by: Martin Sperl <kernel at martin.sperl.org>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/brcm,bcm2835-dma.txt | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/brcm,bcm2835-dma.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/brcm,bcm2835-dma.txt
> index 1396078..f9e84ee 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/brcm,bcm2835-dma.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/brcm,bcm2835-dma.txt
> @@ -17,6 +17,10 @@ Required properties:
> - brcm,dma-channel-mask: Bit mask representing the channels
> not used by the firmware in ascending order,
> i.e. first channel corresponds to LSB.
> +- brcm,dma-channel-shared-mask: Bit mask representing the channels
> + that use a shared interrupt
Generally we don't like masks in DT (though I see this is in keeping with
another property above). I won't push strongly here.
I take it that this is a fixed HW property rather than a software configuration
> +- brcm,dma-shared-irq-index: index of which of the interrupts mentioned
> + above is the shared interrupt
What is the usual order of the interrupts? How are they expected to be parsed
if this is in the middle of the list, for example?
I think this needs a more thorough description.
More information about the linux-rpi-kernel