[PATCH v4] dt-bindings: brcm: rationalize Broadcom documentation naming
robherring2 at gmail.com
Thu Mar 26 12:00:24 PDT 2015
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:41 AM, Scott Branden <sbranden at broadcom.com> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> On 15-03-22 06:20 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 03/20/2015 08:06 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
>>> This patchset attempts to standardize the naming of dt-bindings
>>> documents based on the Broadcom vendor prefix of brcm.
>>> Although there are no guidelines currently present for how to name
>>> the dt-bindings document the "vendor,binding.txt" style is in use by
>>> some of the other vendors.
>>> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee at kernel.org>
>>> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli at gmail.com>
>>> Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0 at gmail.com>
>>> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Scott Branden <sbranden at broadcom.com>
>> Version history would be nice...
> Yes, I should have added a cover letter but didn't. The difference between
> versions was minimal: a spelling correction in the commit message text and a
> few additional binding files were found that were added between the
> versions, along with the Ack's.
>> Who did you want to apply this? I can, but I'm worried about merge
>> conflicts here. Hopefully, you're not also doing lots of changes to
>> existing bindings.
> Yes, it would be great for you to take care of applying this. There
> shouldn't be any merge conflicts as none of these bindings are currently
> being updated. I left a clock binding document out of this patchset at Ray
> Jui is updating/renaming the documentation for that binding in a different
> patch already.
Okay, thanks. I've applied it.
More information about the linux-rpi-kernel