[PATCH V5 REPOST 6/7] mmc: add bcm2835 driver

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Hi Stephen,

On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 23:34:21 -0700, Stephen Warren
<swarren at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:

> On 02/03/2013 04:27 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 19:26:58 -0700, Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> This adds a simple driver for the BCM2835's SD controller.
> >>
> >> Workarounds are implemented for:
> >> * Register writes can't be too close to each-other in time, or they will
> >>   be lost.
> >> * Register accesses must all be 32-bit, so implement custom accessors.
> >>
> >> This code was extracted from:
> >> git://github.com/gonzoua/u-boot-pi.git master
> >> which was created by Oleksandr Tymoshenko.
> >>
> >> Portions of the code there were obviously based on the Linux kernel at:
> >> git://github.com/raspberrypi/linux.git rpi-3.6.y
> >> commit f5b930b "Main bcm2708 linux port" signed-off-by Dom Cobley.
> >>
> >> swarren changed the following for upstream:
> >> * Removed hack udelay()s in bcm2835_sdhci_raw_writel(); setting
> >>   SDHCI_QUIRK_WAIT_SEND_CMD appears to solve the issues.
> >> * Remove register logging from read*/write* functions.
> >> * Sort out confusion with min/max_freq values passed to add_sdhci().
> >> * Use more descriptive variable names and calculations in IO accessors.
> >> * Simplified and commented twoticks_delay calculation.
> >> * checkpatch fixes.
> >>
> >> Cc: Andy Fleming <afleming at gmail.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo at bluezbox.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org>
> >> ---
> >> Andy, could you please ack this so Albert can take it through the ARM tree;
> >> patch 7/7 depends is an ARM patch and depends on this. Thanks.
> ...
> > Andy, can you give a formal Acked-By to this patch as per Stephen's
> > request?
> > 
> > Thanks in advance!
> 
> Albert, it looks like Andy actually did already Ack this, back in
> November last year; see:
> 
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-November/141064.html
> 
> Note that when I reposted V5 in January, I merged the ARM/mailbox/video
> patches and MMC series together, hence the different patch numbers.
> 
> Are you OK pulling this series out of patchwork to be applied, or should
> I repost? Thanks.

I'll apply the series from patchwork to u-boot-arm/master, adding
Andy's Ack manually in 6/7. If these apply cleanly, then all right.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.