[PATCH v9 05/13] dt-bindings: npu: rockchip: add rockchip,rk3576-rknn-core

[Igor Paunovic]

Hi Jiaxing,

> Here is the table. It does not say what I told you it said, so the
> retraction comes first.

Thank you for the table, and for leading with the retraction. The
replacement is worth more than the sentence it replaces: 364 of 364
with a single register partitioning the two groups one to one is a
field with a reason, even if what selects the arm is still open.

The third value is the honest kind of catch too - a row that breaks
the lockstep and narrows the claim to the regular datapath instead
of being averaged into it.

> The script that produces every number in it is small enough to
> send if you want to re-run it against your own corpus.

Yes, please send it. One honest note first: there is no vendor
.rknn on this disk - everything on my RK3588 side is upstream Mesa
and generated TFLite, and the script reads .rknn. So the run worth
doing from here is the axis your corpus cannot test: all 94 of your
files carry the same 2.3.2 build string, and I will try to collect
files produced by other toolkit versions and point the script at
those. If 34/66 <-> 0x4044 holds across versions, that is one more
thing RESERVED_0 is not.

On v11: the clocks patch carried exactly as sent, authorship chain
intact. Thank you for doing that carefully.

Igor