[PATCH v2 1/3] ASoC: dt-bindings: rk3308-codec: describe detection and ADC routing
Xing Zheng
zhengxing at rock-chips.com
Wed Nov 4 17:25:50 PST 2026
Hi Mark,
On 11/2/26 06:45, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2026 at 12:41:47PM +0800, Xing Zheng wrote:
>> Describe the optional detect-GRF phandle and named interrupt resources
>> used by the B/C headphone detector. Retain the legacy interrupt order
>> and index-based lookup when names are absent. Document the detector
>> disable and reversed-jack properties and their resource dependencies.
> Please don't send new patches in reply to old patches or serieses, this
> makes it harder for both people and tools to understand what is going
> on - it can bury things in mailboxes and make it difficult to keep track
> of what current patches are, both for the new patches and the old ones.
Understood. Any future patch series or revision I submit will start
its own thread, with links to earlier versions in the cover letter.
I am putting this series on hold while I investigate playback and
capture problems observed on our EVB with upstream codec changes
backported to our downstream 6.12 kernel.
Before these backports, sound/soc/codecs/rk3308_codec.c and .h matched
the upstream versions at 2ba2d17170f9 ("ASoC: codecs: rk3308: fix
building without CONFIG_OF"). On top of that codec baseline, I applied
the following upstream commits:
2d8a091725e6 ASoC: codecs: rk3308: convert to snd_soc_dapm_xxx()
0c55552b5f5e ASoC: codecs: rk33*: use .auto_selectable_formats
157f7cba77a9 ASoC: codecs: rk3308: add support for codec revision B
I also backported a1c99b6097af ("ASoC: soc-component: add
snd_soc_component_to_dapm()") for the DAPM accessor used by the
converted driver. These are upstream commit IDs; the rest of the
kernel remains based on downstream 6.12.
I have not yet determined whether the playback and capture issues
are in the upstream driver or in the backport/integration.
I will rework any necessary changes against the current upstream base
and validate playback and capture on the EVB before resubmitting.
Depending on the remaining scope, I will send either a revised v3 of
this series or a separate, focused patch or series. In either case,
the submission will start a new thread and reference the earlier
series where relevant.
Thank you for the review and the threading guidance.
Best Regards
Xing Zheng
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list