[PATCH V13 8/9] iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add Gyroscope to icm42607

Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko at intel.com
Tue Jun 16 03:13:03 PDT 2026


On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 12:25:51PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote:

> Add gyroscope functions to the icm42607 driver.

...

> +int inv_icm42607_set_gyro_conf(struct inv_icm42607_state *st,
> +			       struct inv_icm42607_sensor_conf *conf,
> +			       unsigned int *sleep_ms)
> +{
> +	struct inv_icm42607_sensor_conf *oldconf = &st->conf.gyro;
> +	unsigned int val;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (conf->mode < 0)
> +		conf->mode = oldconf->mode;
> +	if (conf->fs < 0)
> +		conf->fs = oldconf->fs;
> +	if (conf->odr < 0)
> +		conf->odr = oldconf->odr;
> +	if (conf->filter < 0)
> +		conf->filter = oldconf->filter;

Same comment as per previous patch. But looking at this, can you rather have
a helper that answers the below two questions? Something like

void _assign_conf(..., bool *write_odr, bool *write_filter)
{
	...
}
EXPORT_...

in the core driver? But wight both approaches and choose either existing one
(as in this patch series) or what I suggested.

> +	if (conf->fs != oldconf->fs || conf->odr != oldconf->odr) {
> +		val = FIELD_PREP(INV_ICM42607_GYRO_CONFIG0_FS_SEL_MASK,
> +				 conf->fs);
> +		val |= FIELD_PREP(INV_ICM42607_GYRO_CONFIG0_ODR_MASK,
> +				  conf->odr);
> +		ret = regmap_write(st->map, INV_ICM42607_REG_GYRO_CONFIG0, val);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +		oldconf->fs = conf->fs;
> +		oldconf->odr = conf->odr;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (conf->filter != oldconf->filter) {
> +		val = FIELD_PREP(INV_ICM42607_GYRO_CONFIG1_FILTER_MASK,
> +				 conf->filter);
> +		ret = regmap_update_bits(st->map, INV_ICM42607_REG_GYRO_CONFIG1,
> +					 INV_ICM42607_GYRO_CONFIG1_FILTER_MASK, val);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +		oldconf->filter = conf->filter;
> +	}
> +
> +	return inv_icm42607_set_pwr_mgmt0(st, conf->mode, st->conf.accel.mode,
> +					  st->conf.temp_en, sleep_ms);
> +}

...

> +{
> +	unsigned int odr;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	guard(mutex)(&st->lock);
> +
> +	odr = st->conf.gyro.odr;
> +
> +	for (i = 5; i < ARRAY_SIZE(inv_icm42607_gyro_odr); ++i) {

Same comment, why pre-increment?

> +		if (i == odr)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +	if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE(inv_icm42607_gyro_odr))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	*val = inv_icm42607_gyro_odr[i][0];
> +	*val2 = inv_icm42607_gyro_odr[i][1];
> +
> +	return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> +}
> +
> +static int inv_icm42607_gyro_write_odr(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> +				       int val, int val2)
> +{
> +	struct inv_icm42607_state *st = iio_device_get_drvdata(indio_dev);
> +	struct device *dev = regmap_get_device(st->map);
> +	unsigned int idx;
> +	struct inv_icm42607_sensor_conf conf = INV_ICM42607_SENSOR_CONF_INIT;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	for (idx = 5; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(inv_icm42607_gyro_odr); ++idx) {

Ditto.

> +		if (val == inv_icm42607_gyro_odr[idx][0] &&
> +		    val2 == inv_icm42607_gyro_odr[idx][1])
> +			break;
> +	}
> +	if (idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(inv_icm42607_gyro_odr))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	conf.odr = idx;
> +
> +	PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_AUTOSUSPEND(dev, pm);
> +	ret = PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	guard(mutex)(&st->lock);
> +
> +	return inv_icm42607_set_gyro_conf(st, &conf, NULL);
> +}

Can be some of the code deduplicated between gyro and accel?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko





More information about the Linux-rockchip mailing list