[PATCH V12 7/9] iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add Accelerometer for icm42607
Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevchenko at intel.com
Mon Jun 15 08:07:15 PDT 2026
On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 09:51:40AM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 02:21:05PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 03:26:04PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote:
...
> > Please, please, use IWYU! So many headers are missing...
> > (Same comment to all files in this series.)
> >
> > + array_size.h
> > + bits.h // BIT()
> > + cleanup.h // guard()()
> > + device/devres.h // devm_kasprintf()
> > + err.h // -EINVAL, IS_ERR()
> >
> > > +#include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> > > +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> > > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > > +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> >
> > + types.h // s16, __be16
> >
> > Also you need to have
> >
> > asm/byteorder.h // be16_to_cpup()
>
> How are you running IWYU against the builds? So far I've tried but I
> can't seem to get it to run properly.
Sorry, I meant "use IWYU principle". I don't run the tool, I just looked into
the code.
...
> > > + for (i = 5; i < ARRAY_SIZE(inv_icm42607_accel_odr); ++i) {
> >
> > Why pre-increment? Same for all other cases.
>
> The register starts at 5 and all values below 5 are invalid. Starting
> this increment at 5 ensures we don't expose invalid values to
> userspace.
It doesn't explain pre-increment. Post-increment should work as is.
> > > + if (i == odr)
> > > + break;
> > > + }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list