[PATCH v5 4/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable CAN controller on RK3588-Tiger-Haikou
Quentin Schulz
quentin.schulz at cherry.de
Thu Jul 30 06:31:41 PDT 2026
Hi Cunhao Lu,
On 7/25/26 9:03 AM, Cunhao Lu wrote:
> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner at cherry.de>
>
> CAN0 is piped through the Q7-connector to the CAN-Header on the Haikou
> base-board, so enable support for it there.
>
> At least on RK3588-Tiger, the CAN clocks default to 99MHz, limiting
> usable CAN bitrates without skew. Errata documentation mentions
> 300MHz as the default frequency on RK3568, so replicate this here
> to allow more bitrates.
>
Can you please move the assigned-clocks* properties to rk3588-tiger.dtsi
instead? RK3588 Tiger is a SOM and Haikou is a carrierboard. The
carrierboard takes the signal directly from the SoC and route those to a
transceiver. I'm assuming all carrierboards for Tiger will need those
two properties, so better have them in the SoM DTSI.
Just apply:
"""
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-tiger-haikou.dts
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-tiger-haikou.dts
index 6273e695b0394..6c57c9f54a305 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-tiger-haikou.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-tiger-haikou.dts
@@ -156,8 +156,6 @@ vddd_audio_1v6: regulator-vddd-audio-1v6 {
};
&can0 {
- assigned-clocks = <&cru CLK_CAN0>;
- assigned-clock-rates = <300000000>;
status = "okay";
};
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-tiger.dtsi
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-tiger.dtsi
index 139f70e7bbd90..161c89c62bcda 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-tiger.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-tiger.dtsi
@@ -90,6 +90,11 @@ vcc5v0_sys: regulator-vcc5v0-sys {
};
};
+&can0 {
+ assigned-clocks = <&cru CLK_CAN0>;
+ assigned-clock-rates = <300000000>;
+};
+
&cpu_b0 {
cpu-supply = <&vdd_cpu_big0_s0>;
};
"""
on top of this patch and squash and we'll have what I would like to have.
If there's no need for a v6, I'm assuming Heiko can simply fix that when
applying and thus there may be no need to send a v6 just for that (but
if you need to send a v6, please consider doing the suggested changes
above).
Thanks!
Quentin
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list