[PATCH v8 04/12] dt-bindings: npu: rockchip: add rockchip,rk3576-rknn-core

[Jiaxing Hu]

Hi Rob,

Taking the last paragraph first, since that is the actionable one.

In v9 the dependency will be in the patch itself, as a git note that
format-patch carries below the ---, rather than only in the cover letter where
it is now. It says the patch touches only Documentation and applies to
v7.2 on its own, and that the series it belongs to is based on next-20260814 plus
Igor Paunovic's "[PATCH v2] accel/rocket: request the core clocks by name",
which the driver patches need and this one does not.

  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20260729130743.128876-1-royalnet026@gmail.com/

I re-ran dt_binding_check after your mail, on the three bindings this series
touches, with dtschema 2026.6, which is the current release on PyPI,
and yamllint 1.38.0.

  npu/rockchip,rk3588-rknn-core.yaml       clean
  power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml     clean
  iommu/rockchip,iommu.yaml                clean

None of the three reports in your mail is in a file this patch touches. The
unresolvable reference is in mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml, and the refcheckdocs
hits are in two translations and arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c. I mention it only
so it is clear I read them rather than assumed, not to argue the bot was
wrong to print them.

v9 is not posted yet, so please read the note as what it will carry and not as
done. I am holding it because v8 drew three reviewers within a day of going out
and I would rather collect the rest of that than reset the thread. Say the word
if you would prefer the respin now and I will send it.

Regards,
Jiaxing