[PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Radxa CM5 IO board

[FUKAUMI Naoki]

On 11/5/25 10:37, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof
> 
> On 10/28/25 19:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 28/10/2025 10:44, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
>>> Hi Joseph
>>>
>>> Your patch seems to be NAKed.
>>> I will submit new patch soon.
>>
>> Sorry, what? Don't hijack other people's work.
> 
> I have Joseph's permission to post my patch.
> 
> Furthermore, this is not the first time, to my knowledge, that someone 
> else has posted another patch for the same board. (See below)
> 
>   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20241226005845.46473-1- 
> naoki at radxa.com/T/#u
>   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20250324-rock5bp-for-upstream- 
> v1-0-6217edf15b19 at kernel.org/T/#u

Could you please write concise and precise answers/comments for the part 
you previously snipped[1]?

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/86939056-7617-4730-9464-f7ecbd0e4537@kernel.org/

Best regards,

--
FUKAUMI Naoki
Radxa Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.

> Best regards,
> 
> -- 
> FUKAUMI Naoki
> Radxa Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
> 
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> FUKAUMI Naoki
>>> Radxa Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
>>>
>>> On 10/28/25 18:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 28/10/2025 10:33, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
>>>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>>>
>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rockchip/ 
>>>>> patch/20250528221823.2974653-2-joseph.kogut at gmail.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/29/25 18:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 03:18:21PM GMT, Joseph Kogut wrote:
>>>>>>> Add device tree binding for the Radxa CM5 IO board.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This board is based on the rk3588s.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads 
>>>>>> (unrelated
>>>>>> or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and might
>>>>>> interfere with applying entire sets.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
>>>>> Please explain the sorting rule used for this file. You must have 
>>>>> known
>>>>> the sorting rule; otherwise, how can you be sure this patch is 
>>>>> correct?
>>>>
>>>> Huh? I don't have a clue about sorting rule but if you mock my review
>>>> let's make it different:
>>>>
>>>> NAK
>>
>>
>> Ah, you were poking around other patch? I should have ignored that :/
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
>