[PATCH 2/8] arm64: dts: rockchip: Refactor DSI nodes on rk3399 boards

[Diederik de Haas]

Hi Quentin,

Thanks for taking a look.

On Fri Jun 27, 2025 at 6:10 PM CEST, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> On 6/27/25 5:16 PM, Diederik de Haas wrote:
>> The #address-cells and #size-cells properties are not useful on the DSI
>> controller nodes; they are only useful/required on ports and panel(s).
>> So remove them from the controller node and add them where actually
>> needed on the various rk3399 based boards.
>> 
>> Next to that, there were several (exact) redefinitions of nodes which
>> are already present in rk3399-base.dtsi to add a mipi_out endpoint.
>> Simplify that by referencing the mipi_out phandle and add the endpoint
>> to that, which allows the removeal of the ports redefinition.
>> 
>> And fix 1 instance where the mipi_out referenced node was not sorted
>> correctly.
>> 
>> This fixes the following DTB validation warnings:
>> 
>>    unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges",
>>    "dma-ranges" or child "reg" property
>> 
>
> Too many unrelated changes in this commit, please split into multiple 
> commits.
>
> I could identify:
>
> - moving address-cells/size-cells from SoC.dtsi to board dts(i)s,
> - reordering properties to better match DT coding style 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.html#order-of-properties-in-device-node
> - use phandle to directly access ports,
> - reorder DT node to better match DT coding style 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.html#order-of-nodes

I initially had it as several commits, but that resulted in (f.e.) 1
issue being fixed, but 1 (or more) others would pop up.
Those were then fixed in follow-up commits, but I assumed I'd get Rob's
bot screaming at me for introducing new warnings (first).

And as they all relate(d) to fixing the dsi node, I then choose to
combine them (but still separated by SoC).
IMO there are several ways to organize the commits and each would have
their pros and cons, so I 'settled' for this arrangement.

So I prefer to wait for other people's opinion first before reorganizing
the commits again (if there's a different consensus).

> The change for RK3399 Puma Haikou Video Demo DTSO is fine for me.

Thanks :)

Cheers,
  Diederik
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/attachments/20250627/f5dba51a/attachment.sig>