[RFC PATCH v1 4/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: add rk3328 usb3 phy node

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 16/01/2025 17:53, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Thu Jan 16, 2025 at 2:01 PM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 15/01/2025 02:26, Peter Geis wrote:
>>> Add the node for the rk3328 usb3 phy. This node provides a combined usb2
>>> and usb3 phy which are permenantly tied to the dwc3 usb3 controller.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout at gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi
>>> index 7d992c3c01ce..181a900d41f9 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi
>>> @@ -903,6 +903,43 @@ u2phy_host: host-port {
>>>  		};
>>>  	};
>>>  
>>> +	usb3phy: usb3-phy at ff460000 {
>>> +		compatible = "rockchip,rk3328-usb3phy";
>>> +		reg = <0x0 0xff460000 0x0 0x10000>;
>>> +		clocks = <&cru SCLK_REF_USB3OTG>, <&cru PCLK_USB3PHY_OTG>, <&cru PCLK_USB3PHY_PIPE>;
>>
>> Please wrap code according to coding style (checkpatch is not a coding
>> style description, but only a tool), so at 80.
> 
> I'm confused: is it 80 or 100?
> 
> I always thought it was 80, but then I saw several patches/commits by

Coding style is clear: it is 80. It also has caveat about code
readability and several maintainers have their own preference.

> Dragan Simic which deliberately changed code to make use of 100.
> Being fed up with my own confusion, I submitted a PR to 
> https://github.com/gregkh/kernel-coding-style/ which got accepted:
> https://github.com/gregkh/kernel-coding-style/commit/5c21f99dc79883bd0efeba368193180275c9c77a

That's not kernel. That's Greg...

> 
> So now both the vim plugins code and README say 100.
> But as noted in my commit message:
> 
>   Note that the current upstream 'Linux kernel coding style' does NOT
>   mention the 100 char limit, but only mentions the preferred max length
>   of 80.
> 
> Or is it 100 for code, but 80 for DeviceTree files and bindings?

>From where did you get 100? Checkpatch, right? Kernel coding style is
clear, there is no discussion, no mentioning 100:

"The preferred limit on the length of a single line is 80 columns. "

So to be clear: all DTS, all DT bindings, all code maintained by me and
some maintainers follows above (and further - there is caveat)
instruction from coding style. Some maintainers follow other rules and
that's fine.

Best regards,
Krzysztof