[PATCH v5 2/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: add overlay test for Edgeble NCM6A

[Quentin Schulz]

Hi Dragan,

On 2/10/25 7:29 PM, Dragan Simic wrote:
> Hello Quentin and Jagan,
> 
> On 2025-02-10 18:57, Quentin Schulz wrote:
>> On 2/10/25 3:11 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>> On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 at 20:50, Quentin Schulz <foss+kernel at 0leil.net> 
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz at cherry.de>
>>>>
>>>> The Edgeble NCM6A can have WiFi modules connected and this is handled
>>>> via an overlay (commit 951d6aaa37fe ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Edgeble
>>>> NCM6A WiFi6 Overlay")).
>>>>
>>>> In order to make sure the overlay is still valid in the future, let's
>>>> add a validation test by applying the overlay on top of the main base
>>>> at build time.
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz at cherry.de>
>>>> ---
>>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile | 4 ++++
>>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile b/arch/arm64/ 
>>>> boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
>>>> index 
>>>> 534e70a649eeada7f9b6f12596b83f5c47b184b4..02f98abe1df10f44f2ac27ea5f6c6e6c6334724e 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
>>>> @@ -192,3 +192,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3568- 
>>>> wolfvision-pf5-vz-2-uhd.dtb
>>>>   rk3568-wolfvision-pf5-vz-2-uhd-dtbs := rk3568-wolfvision-pf5.dtb \
>>>>          rk3568-wolfvision-pf5-display-vz.dtbo \
>>>>          rk3568-wolfvision-pf5-io-expander.dtbo
>>>> +
>>>> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3588-edgeble-neu6a-wifi.dtb
>>>> +rk3588-edgeble-neu6a-wifi-dtbs := rk3588-edgeble-neu6a-io.dtb \
>>>> +       rk3588-edgeble-neu6a-wifi.dtbo
>>>
>>> Please add neu6b-io as well, wifi dtbo is similar for it as well.
>>
>> Similar or identical :)?
>>
>> Should the overlay be renamed if it applies to neu6b AND neu6a instead
>> of implying it's only for neu6a based on the name of the overlay?
> 
> I'm afraid it's a bit too late for renaming the .dtso file. :/

How is it too late? Is there some rule somewhere about renaming I missed?

Cheers,
Quentin