[can-next,v3,00/20] can: rockchip_canfd: add support for CAN-FD IP core found on Rockchip RK3568

[Marc Kleine-Budde]

On 02.09.2024 10:29:38, Alibek Omarov wrote:
> > Are you using the CAN in production devices? The driver runs quite good
> > on a v3 chip, but still not stable on the v2. But as our customer now
> > only uses v3, I don't have any more time left to fix v2 issues. Drop me
> > a note, if you have issues with the v2 chip.
> 
> Oh, I meant v2 patch set.

Ok I see :) The difference between the patch series v2 and v3 was change
in the compatibles and DT bindings. I've added your Tested-by to the
upcoming v4, I thinks this is still OK, right?

> We're probably mostly running on v3 chips, since nobody so far
> complained about CAN bus and you're also telling it more stable there.
> :)

With the v3 SoC the CAN runs more stable than with the v2 SoC, but still
not 1000%. My basic idea was to get it mainline and thus a larger usage
and test coverage.

Nevertheless, I am very interested in any usage or test cases that break
the driver.

regards,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde          |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung Nürnberg              | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9   |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/attachments/20240902/a64e2a3d/attachment.sig>