[PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rkvdec2 Video Decoder on rk3588(s)
Jonas Karlman
jonas at kwiboo.se
Mon Jun 24 02:16:33 PDT 2024
Hi Detlev and Alex,
On 2024-06-20 15:31, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> Hi Jonas, Alex,
>
> On Wednesday, June 19, 2024 2:06:40 P.M. EDT Jonas Karlman wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> On 2024-06-19 19:19, Alex Bee wrote:
>>> Am 19.06.24 um 17:28 schrieb Jonas Karlman:
>>>> Hi Detlev,
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-06-19 16:57, Detlev Casanova wrote:
>>>>> Add the rkvdec2 Video Decoder to the RK3588s devicetree.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova at collabora.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi
>>>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi index
>>>>> 6ac5ac8b48ab..7690632f57f1 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -2596,6 +2596,16 @@ system_sram2: sram at ff001000 {
>>>>>
>>>>> ranges = <0x0 0x0 0xff001000 0xef000>;
>>>>> #address-cells = <1>;
>>>>> #size-cells = <1>;
>>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> + vdec0_sram: rkvdec-sram at 0 {
>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x78000>;
>>>>> + pool;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + vdec1_sram: rkvdec-sram at 1 {
>>>>> + reg = <0x78000 0x77000>;
>>>>> + pool;
>>>>> + };
>>>>>
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> pinctrl: pinctrl {
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -2665,6 +2675,46 @@ gpio4: gpio at fec50000 {
>>>>>
>>>>> #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>>>>>
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> + vdec0: video-decoder at fdc38100 {
>>>>> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-vdec";
>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0xfdc38100 0x0 0x500>;
>>>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 95 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
>>>>> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_RKVDEC0>, <&cru HCLK_RKVDEC0>,
> <&cru
>>>>> CLK_RKVDEC0_CA>, + <&cru
> CLK_RKVDEC0_CORE>, <&cru
>>>>> CLK_RKVDEC0_HEVC_CA>;
>>>>> + clock-names = "axi", "ahb", "cabac", "core",
> "hevc_cabac";
>>>>> + assigned-clocks = <&cru ACLK_RKVDEC0>, <&cru
> CLK_RKVDEC0_CORE>,
>>>>> + <&cru CLK_RKVDEC0_CA>, <&cru
> CLK_RKVDEC0_HEVC_CA>;
>>>>> + assigned-clock-rates = <800000000>, <600000000>,
>>>>> + <600000000>, <1000000000>;
>>>>> + resets = <&cru SRST_A_RKVDEC0>, <&cru SRST_H_RKVDEC0>,
> <&cru
>>>>> SRST_RKVDEC0_CA>, + <&cru
> SRST_RKVDEC0_CORE>, <&cru
>>>>> SRST_RKVDEC0_HEVC_CA>;
>>>>> + reset-names = "rst_axi", "rst_ahb", "rst_cabac",
>>>>> + "rst_core", "rst_hevc_cabac";
>>>>> + power-domains = <&power RK3588_PD_RKVDEC0>;
>>>>> + sram = <&vdec0_sram>;
>>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + vdec1: video-decoder at fdc40100 {
>>>>> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-vdec";
>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0xfdc40100 0x0 0x500>;
>>>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 97 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
>>>>> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_RKVDEC1>, <&cru HCLK_RKVDEC1>,
> <&cru
>>>>> CLK_RKVDEC1_CA>, + <&cru
> CLK_RKVDEC1_CORE>, <&cru
>>>>> CLK_RKVDEC1_HEVC_CA>;
>>>>> + clock-names = "axi", "ahb", "cabac", "core",
> "hevc_cabac";
>>>>> + assigned-clocks = <&cru ACLK_RKVDEC1>, <&cru
> CLK_RKVDEC1_CORE>,
>>>>> + <&cru CLK_RKVDEC1_CA>, <&cru
> CLK_RKVDEC1_HEVC_CA>;
>>>>> + assigned-clock-rates = <800000000>, <600000000>,
>>>>> + <600000000>, <1000000000>;
>>>>> + resets = <&cru SRST_A_RKVDEC1>, <&cru SRST_H_RKVDEC1>,
> <&cru
>>>>> SRST_RKVDEC1_CA>, + <&cru
> SRST_RKVDEC1_CORE>, <&cru
>>>>> SRST_RKVDEC1_HEVC_CA>;
>>>>> + reset-names = "rst_axi", "rst_ahb", "rst_cabac",
>>>>> + "rst_core", "rst_hevc_cabac";
>>>>> + power-domains = <&power RK3588_PD_RKVDEC1>;
>>>>> + sram = <&vdec1_sram>;
>>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>>> + };
>>>>
>>>> This is still missing the iommus, please add the iommus, they should be
>>>>
>>>> supported/same as the one used for e.g. VOP2:
>>>> compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-iommu", "rockchip,rk3568-iommu";
>>>>
>>>> The VOP2 MMUs does have one extra mmu_cfg_mode flag in AUTO_GATING,
>>>> compared to the VDPU381 MMUs, however only the AV1D MMU should be
>>>> special on RK3588.
>>>>
>>>> Please add the iommus :-)
>>>
>>> When looking add the vendor DT/iommu driver I'm seeing serval quirks
>>> applied for vdec's iommus. Since it's rightly frowned upon adding such
>>> boolean-quirk-properties to upstream devicetrees, we'd at least need
>>> additional (fallback-) compatibles, even if it works with the iommu driver
>>> as is (what I doubt, but haven't tested). We need to be able to apply
>>> those
>>> quirks later without changing the devicetree (as usual) and I'm sure RK
>>> devs haven't added these quirks for the personal amusement.
>>
>> Based on what I investigated the hw should work similar, and the quirks
>> mostly seem related to optimizations and sw quirks, like do not zap each
>> line, keep it alive even when pm runtime say it is not in use and other
>> quirks that seem to be more of sw nature on how to best utilize the hw.
>
> I did some testing with the IOMMU but unfortunately, I'm only getting page
> fault errors. This may be something I'm doing wrong, but it clearly needs more
> investigation.
I re-tested and the addition of sram seem to now cause page faults, the
sram also need to be mapped in the iommu.
However, doing more testing revealed that use of iommu present the same
issue as seen with hevc on rk3399, after a fail fluster tests continue
to fail until a reset.
Seeing how this issue was very similar I re-tested on rk3399 without
iommu and cma=1G and could observe that there was no longer any need to
reset after a failed test. Interestingly the score also went up from
135 to 137/147.
Digging some more revealed that the iommu also is reset during the
internal rkvdec soft reset on error, leaving the iommu with dte_addr=0
and paging in disabled state.
Ensuring that the iommu was reconfigured after a failure fixed the issue
observed on rk3399 and I now also get 137/147 hevc fluster score using
the iommu.
Will send out a rkvdec hevc v2 series after some more testing.
Guessing there is a similar need to reconfigure iommu on rk3588, and my
initial tests also showed promising result, however more tests are
needed.
Regards,
Jonas
>
>>> If Detlev says
>>> iommu is out of scope for this series (which is valid), I'd say it's fine
>>> to leave them out for now (as no binding exists) and the HW works
>>> (obviously) fine without them.
>>
>> Sure, use of MMU can be added later.
>
> I'd rather go for that for now. I'll add that IMMU support is missing in the
> TODO file.
>
>> Regards,
>> Jonas
>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Jonas
>>>>
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> #include "rk3588s-pinctrl.dtsi"
>
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list