[PATCH v14 2/6] media: imagination: Add E5010 JPEG Encoder driver

Sebastian Fricke sebastian.fricke at collabora.com
Fri Jun 21 06:26:58 PDT 2024


Hey Devarsh,

On 21.06.2024 18:14, Devarsh Thakkar wrote:
>Hi Sebastian
>
>On 21/06/24 18:07, Sebastian Fricke wrote:
>> Hey Devarsh,
>>
>> This doesn't compile without errors for me, curious, it probably did
>> compile without problems for you right?
>>
>> drivers/media/platform/imagination/e5010-jpeg-enc.c:1622:19: error:
>> initialization of ‘int (*)(struct platform_device *)’ from incompatible
>> pointer type ‘void (*)(struct platform_device *)’
>> [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
>>  1622 |         .remove = e5010_remove,
>>       |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/media/platform/imagination/e5010-jpeg-enc.c:1622:19: note: (near
>> initialization for ‘e5010_driver.remove’)
>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>>
>
>Yes I think it did compile fine for me.
>Did you try this on tip of linux-next ?

Nope the media subsystem is not based on linux-next, but instead on:
https://git.linuxtv.org/media_stage.git/log/
Please make sure that your patches compile on top of that.

>
>As mentioned in changelog, there was update in platform driver for return type
>of remove function which got changed to void return type. Please check if you
>have this patch [1] in your tree which got recently merged.

No that patch is not part of the tree yet.

Please note also the following section in that patch:

  	/*
	 * Traditionally the remove callback returned an int which however is
	 * ignored by the driver core. This led to wrong expectations by driver
	 * authors who thought returning an error code was a valid error
	 * handling strategy. To convert to a callback returning void, new
	 * drivers should implement .remove_new() until the conversion it done
	 * that eventually makes .remove() return void.

So your driver is expected to implement remove_new().

I will take care of this for the PR, but please note for the future:
It has to work with media_stage, unless you have a very good reason for
something different.

>
>Kindly let me know if you still face any issues.
>
>[1]:
>https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240527083416.1177106-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de/
>
>Regards
>Devarsh

Regards,
Sebastian



More information about the Linux-rockchip mailing list