[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Firefly Core-PX30-JD4 with baseboard

[Conor Dooley]

On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 09:31:45AM +0100, Christopher Obbard wrote:
> Hi Dragan,
> 
> Thanks for the review.
> 
> On Thu, 2024-07-18 at 06:36 +0200, Dragan Simic wrote:
> > Hello Christopher,
> > 
> > On 2024-07-17 18:46, Christopher Obbard wrote:
> > > Add binding for the Firefly Core-PX30-JD4 SoM when used in conjunction
> > > with the MB-JD4-RK3328 & PX30 baseboard.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard at collabora.com>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 6 ++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> > > index 1ef09fbfdfaf5..33ca8028bc151 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> > > @@ -148,6 +148,12 @@ properties:
> > >            - const: engicam,px30-core
> > >            - const: rockchip,px30
> > > 
> > > +      - description: Firefly Core-PX30-JD4 with MB-JD4-PX30 baseboard
> > > +        items:
> > > +          - const: firefly,px30-mb-jd4
> > > +          - const: firefly,px30-core-jd4
> > 
> > Similarly to how I suggested the new dts(i) files to be named, [1]
> > the model names should be named like this:
> > 
> >            - const: firefly,px30-jd4-core
> >            - const: firefly,px30-jd4-core-mb
> 
> I suppose the order should be the other way around to match other entries, e.g
> firefly,px30-jd4-core-mb first?

Yes. Mainboard first, then som, then soc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/attachments/20240718/fc4534a3/attachment.sig>