[PATCH v1 5/5] media: rkisp1: Add support for the companding block

Jacopo Mondi jacopo.mondi at ideasonboard.com
Thu Jul 4 03:40:42 PDT 2024


Hi Laurent
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 01:25:33AM GMT, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> From: Paul Elder <paul.elder at ideasonboard.com>
>
> Add support to the rkisp1 driver for the companding block that exists on
> the i.MX8MP version of the ISP. This requires usage of the new
> extensible parameters format, and showcases how the format allows for
> extensions without breaking backward compatibility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder at ideasonboard.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> Changes since v0:
>
> - Drop RKISP1_EXT_PARAM_BUFFER_V2
> - Use common structure for compression and expansion curves
> - Rename config fields in rkisp1_ext_params_*_config to just config
> - Mention block type in structures documentation
> - Constify arguments
> - Replace __uxx types with uxx
> - Use rkisp1_bls_swap_regs() helper in rkisp1_compand_bls_config()
> - Use generic feature handling mechanism
> ---
>  .../platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-params.c  | 166 ++++++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/rkisp1-config.h            |  85 ++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 250 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-params.c b/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-params.c
> index bac9d4972493..5865d53be9c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-params.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-params.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ union rkisp1_ext_params_config {
>  	struct rkisp1_ext_params_hst_config hst;
>  	struct rkisp1_ext_params_aec_config aec;
>  	struct rkisp1_ext_params_afc_config afc;
> +	struct rkisp1_ext_params_compand_bls_config compand_bls;
> +	struct rkisp1_ext_params_compand_curve_config compand_curve;
>  };
>
>  enum rkisp1_params_formats {
> @@ -1258,6 +1260,92 @@ rkisp1_dpf_strength_config(struct rkisp1_params *params,
>  	rkisp1_write(params->rkisp1, RKISP1_CIF_ISP_DPF_STRENGTH_R, arg->r);
>  }
>
> +static void rkisp1_compand_write_px_curve(struct rkisp1_params *params,
> +					  unsigned int addr, const u8 *px_curve)
> +{
> +	size_t i, j;
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The compand curve is specified as a piecewise linear function with
> +	 * 64 points. X coordinates are stored as a log2 of the displacement
> +	 * from the previous point, in 5 bits, with 6 values per register. The
> +	 * last register stores 4 values.
> +	 */
> +	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
> +		val = 0;
> +		for (j = 0; j < 6; j++)

This loops up to (9 * 6 + 5 = 59) and writes registers up to PX9
This should probably be i < 11 or <= 10 as the companding PX curve has
64 points and 10 registers.

Also, to make sure, I would define the number of PX() registers
entries instead of using the crude '10' and '6' values

> +			val |= ((px_curve[i * 6 + j] & 0x1f) << (j * 5));

Can't you just assign val without initializing it to 0 first and
or-ing it later ?

Also, once you make the external loop go up to 11, the last two
iterations will out-of-bound access px[64] and px[65] (px is declared
of size "RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_MAX_SAMPLES 64").

So this probably needs a check:

                if (i == 10 && j > 3)
                        break;

before accessing px_curve[], or maybe declare the for loop as

		for (j = 0; j < (i == 10 ? 4 : 6); j++)

> +		rkisp1_write(params->rkisp1, addr + (i * 4), val);

Then the parameteric macros
RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_EXPAND_PX_N(n)
RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_COMPRESS_PX_N(n)

are unused if not for the base address. Should you remove them and
only declare the base address value ?

> +	}
> +
> +	val = 0;
> +	for (j = 0; j < 4; j++)
> +		val |= ((px_curve[60 + j] & 0x1f) << (j * 5));

...

ok, I should maybe read the whole function before commenting. I left
the above comments there in case you want to unify the loop.

> +	rkisp1_write(params->rkisp1, addr + (i * 4), val);
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +rkisp1_compand_write_curve_mem(struct rkisp1_params *params,
> +			       unsigned int reg_addr, unsigned int reg_data,
> +			       size_t num_samples, const u32 *curve)

isn't the number of samples fixed to
RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_MAX_SAMPLES ?

> +{
> +	size_t i;

why a size and not an unsigned int ?
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_samples; i++) {
> +		rkisp1_write(params->rkisp1, reg_addr, i);
> +		rkisp1_write(params->rkisp1, reg_data, curve[i]);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +rkisp1_compand_bls_config(struct rkisp1_params *params,
> +			  const struct rkisp1_cif_isp_compand_bls_config *arg)
> +{
> +	static const u32 regs[] = {
> +		RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_BLS_A_FIXED,
> +		RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_BLS_B_FIXED,
> +		RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_BLS_C_FIXED,
> +		RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_BLS_D_FIXED,
> +	};
> +	u32 swapped[4];
> +
> +	rkisp1_bls_swap_regs(params->raw_type, regs, swapped);
> +
> +	rkisp1_write(params->rkisp1, swapped[0], arg->r);
> +	rkisp1_write(params->rkisp1, swapped[1], arg->gr);
> +	rkisp1_write(params->rkisp1, swapped[2], arg->gb);
> +	rkisp1_write(params->rkisp1, swapped[3], arg->b);
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +rkisp1_compand_expand_config(struct rkisp1_params *params,
> +			     const struct rkisp1_cif_isp_compand_curve_config *arg)
> +{
> +	rkisp1_compand_write_px_curve(params, RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_EXPAND_PX_N(0),
> +				      arg->px);
> +	rkisp1_compand_write_curve_mem(params, RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_EXPAND_Y_ADDR,
> +				       RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_EXPAND_Y_WRITE_DATA,
> +				       ARRAY_SIZE(arg->y), arg->y);
> +	rkisp1_compand_write_curve_mem(params, RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_EXPAND_X_ADDR,
> +				       RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_EXPAND_X_WRITE_DATA,
> +				       ARRAY_SIZE(arg->x), arg->x);

As the header reports

 * @x: Compand curve x-values. The functionality of these parameters are
 *     unknown to do a lack of hardware documentation, but these are left here

 is it safe to write them ?

> +}
> +
> +static void
> +rkisp1_compand_compress_config(struct rkisp1_params *params,
> +			       const struct rkisp1_cif_isp_compand_curve_config *arg)
> +{
> +	rkisp1_compand_write_px_curve(params, RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_COMPRESS_PX_N(0),
> +				      arg->px);
> +	rkisp1_compand_write_curve_mem(params, RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_COMPRESS_Y_ADDR,
> +				       RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_COMPRESS_Y_WRITE_DATA,
> +				       ARRAY_SIZE(arg->y), arg->y);
> +	rkisp1_compand_write_curve_mem(params, RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_COMPRESS_X_ADDR,
> +				       RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_COMPRESS_X_WRITE_DATA,
> +				       ARRAY_SIZE(arg->x), arg->x);
> +}
> +
>  static void
>  rkisp1_isp_isr_other_config(struct rkisp1_params *params,
>  			    const struct rkisp1_params_cfg *new_params)
> @@ -1844,6 +1932,66 @@ rkisp1_ext_params_afcm(struct rkisp1_params *params,
>  				      RKISP1_CIF_ISP_AFM_ENA);
>  }
>
> +static void rkisp1_ext_params_compand_bls(struct rkisp1_params *params,
> +					  const union rkisp1_ext_params_config *block)

nit: I presume going over 80-cols here is intentional

> +{
> +	const struct rkisp1_ext_params_compand_bls_config *bls =
> +		&block->compand_bls;
> +
> +	if (bls->header.enable == RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_DISABLE) {
> +		rkisp1_param_clear_bits(params, RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_CTRL,
> +					RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_CTRL_BLS_ENABLE);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	rkisp1_compand_bls_config(params, &bls->config);
> +
> +	if (!(params->enabled_blocks &
> +	      BIT(RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_COMPAND_BLS)))
> +		rkisp1_param_set_bits(params, RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_CTRL,
> +				      RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_CTRL_BLS_ENABLE);
> +}
> +
> +static void rkisp1_ext_params_compand_expand(struct rkisp1_params *params,
> +					     const union rkisp1_ext_params_config *block)
> +{
> +	const struct rkisp1_ext_params_compand_curve_config *curve =
> +		&block->compand_curve;
> +
> +	if (curve->header.enable == RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_DISABLE) {
> +		rkisp1_param_clear_bits(params, RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_CTRL,
> +					RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_CTRL_EXPAND_ENABLE);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	rkisp1_compand_expand_config(params, &curve->config);
> +
> +	if (!(params->enabled_blocks &
> +	      BIT(RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_COMPAND_EXPAND)))
> +		rkisp1_param_set_bits(params, RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_CTRL,
> +				      RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_CTRL_EXPAND_ENABLE);
> +}
> +
> +static void rkisp1_ext_params_compand_compress(struct rkisp1_params *params,
> +					       const union rkisp1_ext_params_config *block)
> +{
> +	const struct rkisp1_ext_params_compand_curve_config *curve =
> +		&block->compand_curve;
> +
> +	if (curve->header.enable == RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_DISABLE) {
> +		rkisp1_param_clear_bits(params, RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_CTRL,
> +					RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_CTRL_COMPRESS_ENABLE);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	rkisp1_compand_compress_config(params, &curve->config);
> +
> +	if (!(params->enabled_blocks &
> +	      BIT(RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_COMPAND_COMPRESS)))
> +		rkisp1_param_set_bits(params, RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_CTRL,
> +				      RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_CTRL_COMPRESS_ENABLE);
> +}
> +
>  typedef void (*rkisp1_block_handler)(struct rkisp1_params *params,
>  			     const union rkisp1_ext_params_config *config);
>
> @@ -1939,6 +2087,24 @@ static const struct rkisp1_ext_params_handler {
>  		.handler	= rkisp1_ext_params_afcm,
>  		.group		= RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_GROUP_OTHERS,
>  	},
> +	[RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_COMPAND_BLS] = {
> +		.size		= sizeof(struct rkisp1_ext_params_compand_bls_config),
> +		.handler	= rkisp1_ext_params_compand_bls,
> +		.group		= RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_GROUP_OTHERS,
> +		.features	= RKISP1_FEATURE_COMPAND,
> +	},
> +	[RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_COMPAND_EXPAND] = {
> +		.size		= sizeof(struct rkisp1_ext_params_compand_curve_config),
> +		.handler	= rkisp1_ext_params_compand_expand,
> +		.group		= RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_GROUP_OTHERS,
> +		.features	= RKISP1_FEATURE_COMPAND,
> +	},
> +	[RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_COMPAND_COMPRESS] = {
> +		.size		= sizeof(struct rkisp1_ext_params_compand_curve_config),
> +		.handler	= rkisp1_ext_params_compand_compress,
> +		.group		= RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_GROUP_OTHERS,
> +		.features	= RKISP1_FEATURE_COMPAND,
> +	},
>  };
>
>  static void rkisp1_ext_params_config(struct rkisp1_params *params,
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rkisp1-config.h b/include/uapi/linux/rkisp1-config.h
> index 00b09c92cca7..dd962df53af5 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/rkisp1-config.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/rkisp1-config.h
> @@ -164,6 +164,11 @@
>  #define RKISP1_CIF_ISP_DPF_MAX_NLF_COEFFS      17
>  #define RKISP1_CIF_ISP_DPF_MAX_SPATIAL_COEFFS  6
>
> +/*
> + * Compand
> + */
> +#define RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_MAX_SAMPLES	64
> +
>  /*
>   * Measurement types
>   */
> @@ -851,6 +856,39 @@ struct rkisp1_params_cfg {
>  	struct rkisp1_cif_isp_isp_other_cfg others;
>  };
>
> +/**
> + * struct rkisp1_cif_isp_compand_bls_config - Rockchip ISP1 Companding parameters (BLS)
> + * @r: Fixed subtraction value for Bayer pattern R
> + * @gr: Fixed subtraction value for Bayer pattern Gr
> + * @gb: Fixed subtraction value for Bayer pattern Gb
> + * @b: Fixed subtraction value for Bayer pattern B
> + *
> + * The values will be subtracted from the sensor values. Note that unlike the
> + * dedicated BLS block, the BLS values in the compander are 20-bit unsigned.

I presume it's not worth mentioning this feature is only supported on
specific platforms, right ?

> + */
> +struct rkisp1_cif_isp_compand_bls_config {
> +	__u32 r;
> +	__u32 gr;
> +	__u32 gb;
> +	__u32 b;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct rkisp1_cif_isp_compand_curve_config - Rockchip ISP1 Companding
> + * parameters (expand and compression curves)

Here and below: multi-line comments are aligned differently in the
rest of the file

* struct rkisp1_cif_isp_compand_curve_config - Rockchip ISP1 Companding
*                                              parameters (expand and compression curves)

> + * @px: Compand curve x-values. Each value stores the distance from the
> + *      previous x-value, expressed as log2 of the distance on 5 bits.
> + * @x: Compand curve x-values. The functionality of these parameters are
> + *     unknown to do a lack of hardware documentation, but these are left here

s/unknown to/unknown due to/

> + *     for future compatibility purposes.

Also, the documentation of struct members in the existing code doesn't
use '.' at the end (not totally true, some do, so up to you)


> + * @y: Compand curve y-values
> + */
> +struct rkisp1_cif_isp_compand_curve_config {
> +	__u8 px[RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_MAX_SAMPLES];
> +	__u32 x[RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_MAX_SAMPLES];
> +	__u32 y[RKISP1_CIF_ISP_COMPAND_MAX_SAMPLES];
> +};
> +
>  /*---------- PART2: Measurement Statistics ------------*/
>
>  /**
> @@ -1018,6 +1056,9 @@ struct rkisp1_stat_buffer {
>   * @RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_HST_MEAS: Histogram statistics
>   * @RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_AEC_MEAS: Auto exposure statistics
>   * @RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_AFC_MEAS: Auto-focus statistics
> + * @RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_COMPAND_BLS: BLS in the compand block
> + * @RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_COMPAND_EXPAND: Companding expand curve
> + * @RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_COMPAND_COMPRESS: Compandding compress curve

s/Compandding/Companding/

>   */
>  enum rkisp1_ext_params_block_type {
>  	RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_BLS,
> @@ -1037,6 +1078,9 @@ enum rkisp1_ext_params_block_type {
>  	RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_HST_MEAS,
>  	RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_AEC_MEAS,
>  	RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_AFC_MEAS,
> +	RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_COMPAND_BLS,
> +	RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_COMPAND_EXPAND,
> +	RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_COMPAND_COMPRESS,
>  };
>
>  /**
> @@ -1384,6 +1428,42 @@ struct rkisp1_ext_params_afc_config {
>  	struct rkisp1_cif_isp_afc_config config;
>  } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
>
> +/**
> + * struct rkisp1_ext_params_compand_bls_config - RkISP1 extensible params
> + * Compand BLS config

Here and in other places 'Compand' is spelled with capital 'C'. Is it
intentional ?

> + *
> + * RkISP1 extensible parameters Companding configuration block (black level
> + * subtraction). Identified by :c:type:`RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_COMPAND_BLS`.
> + *
> + * @header: The RkISP1 extensible parameters header, see
> + *	    :c:type:`rkisp1_ext_params_block_header`
> + * @config: Companding BLS configuration, see
> + *	    :c:type:`rkisp1_cif_isp_compand_bls_config`
> + */
> +struct rkisp1_ext_params_compand_bls_config {
> +	struct rkisp1_ext_params_block_header header;
> +	struct rkisp1_cif_isp_compand_bls_config config;
> +} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
> +
> +/**
> + * struct rkisp1_ext_params_compand_curve_config - RkISP1 extensible params
> + * Compand curve config
> + *
> + * RkISP1 extensible parameters Companding configuration block (expand and
> + * compression curves). Identified by
> + * :c:type:`RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_COMPAND_EXPAND`or
> + * :c:type:`RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_BLOCK_TYPE_COMPAND_COMPRESS`.
> + *
> + * @header: The RkISP1 extensible parameters header, see
> + *	    :c:type:`rkisp1_ext_params_block_header`
> + * @config: Companding curve configuration, see
> + *	    :c:type:`rkisp1_cif_isp_compand_curve_config`
> + */
> +struct rkisp1_ext_params_compand_curve_config {
> +	struct rkisp1_ext_params_block_header header;
> +	struct rkisp1_cif_isp_compand_curve_config config;
> +} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
> +
>  #define RKISP1_EXT_PARAMS_MAX_SIZE					\
>  	(sizeof(struct rkisp1_ext_params_bls_config)			+\
>  	sizeof(struct rkisp1_ext_params_dpcc_config)			+\
> @@ -1401,7 +1481,10 @@ struct rkisp1_ext_params_afc_config {
>  	sizeof(struct rkisp1_ext_params_awb_meas_config)		+\
>  	sizeof(struct rkisp1_ext_params_hst_config)			+\
>  	sizeof(struct rkisp1_ext_params_aec_config)			+\
> -	sizeof(struct rkisp1_ext_params_afc_config))
> +	sizeof(struct rkisp1_ext_params_afc_config)			+\
> +	sizeof(struct rkisp1_ext_params_compand_bls_config)		+\
> +	sizeof(struct rkisp1_ext_params_compand_curve_config)		+\
> +	sizeof(struct rkisp1_ext_params_compand_curve_config))

Do we need a comment to say why there are two entries of the same
type or not ?

>
>  /**
>   * enum rksip1_ext_param_buffer_version - RkISP1 extensible parameters version
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
>



More information about the Linux-rockchip mailing list