[PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: add spi controller aliases on rk3399
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org
Tue Jan 9 11:13:23 PST 2024
On 09/01/2024 16:22, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> Am Dienstag, 9. Januar 2024, 16:15:30 CET schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
>> On 09/01/2024 14:35, Quentin Schulz wrote:
>>> From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz at theobroma-systems.com>
>>>
>>> There are 6 SPI controllers on RK3399 and they are all numbered in the
>>> TRM, so let's add the appropriate aliases to the main DTSI so that any
>>> RK3399-based board doesn't need to define the aliases themselves to
>>> benefit from stable SPI indices in userspace.
>>
>> But that contradicts the point that board should define aliases for
>> exposable interfaces. Sorry, that's a NAK.
>
> didn't we have this same discussion some weeks ago? ;-) .
We could have and my feedback might be repeated every time someone does
something against common policy or common sense without explaining it.
>
> I.e. spi2 on Rockchip socs is called spi2 in _all_ SoC documentation,
This does not matter.
> lines in _all_ schematics are also always called spi2_foo , so as before
If you mean board schematics, then this matters.
> I really don't see any value in repeating the very same aliases in
> _every_ board.
>
> Same for i2c, uart .
>
The same as in all previous discussions: the board labels them and these
should match the board labeling.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/CAK8P3a25iYksubCnQb1-e5yj=crEsK37RB9Hn4ZGZMwcVVrG7g@mail.gmail.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/27455049.omNFrla0xU@wuerfel/
These are replies from your upstream maintainer, if you disagree with me.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list