[PATCH v3 00/10] IOMMU memory observability

[Michal Koutný]

On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 11:29:43AM -0500, Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin at soleen.com> wrote:
> Thank you for taking a look at this. The two patches [1] [2] which add
> GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT were sent separate from this series at request of
> reviewers:

Ah, I didn't catch that.

Though, I mean the patch 02/10 calls iommu_alloc_pages() with GFP_KERNEL
(and not a passed gfp from iommu_map).
Then patch 09/10 accounts all iommu_alloc_pages() under NR_IOMMU_PAGES.

I think there is a difference between what's shown NR_IOMMU_PAGES and
what will have __GFP_ACCOUNT because of that.

I.e. is it the intention that this difference is not subject to
limiting?

(Note: I'm not familiar with iommu code and moreover I'm only looking at
the two patch sets, not the complete code applied. So you may correct my
reasoning.)


Thanks,
Michal
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/attachments/20240104/0024c11d/attachment-0001.sig>