[PATCH 3/3] iio: adc: rockchip_saradc: replace custom logic with devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive

Andy Shevchenko andy.shevchenko at gmail.com
Tue Feb 27 04:48:32 PST 2024

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:31 PM Dragan Simic <dsimic at manjaro.org> wrote:
> On 2024-02-23 15:39, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 3:10 PM Quentin Schulz
> > <quentin.schulz at theobroma-systems.com> wrote:
> >> On 2/23/24 14:00, Andy Shevchenko wrote:


> >> I would still be reachable at that Cc address without having to modify
> >> the .mailmap after the fact (which won't make it to an earlier version
> >> of the kernel for example). Some maintainers don't really like this,
> >> some don't mind, we'll see in which category the IIO maintainer(s)
> >> fall
> >> in :) (I don't mind either way just to be clear).
> >
> > My point is that Cc and other similar (non-real-tags) stuff is
> > polluting commit messages. It means that this will be copied to the
> > Git index to all kernel git repositories in the world from now and
> > then, This is at bare minimum makes additional burden on git log (and
> > parsing and so on) and moreover, wastes resources becoming less
> > environment friendly (no jokes). Using --cc or moving to the behind
> > the commit message will keep email copied with cleaner commit
> > messages. Yet, all email tags are available in lore archive
> > (lore.kernel.org). Please, really reconsider the commit messages
> > content in the Linux kernel project and elsewhere, it will help to
> > make the world more friendly.
> Believe it or not, I'm working on some patches for Git that, I believe,
> should help a lot when it comes to handling Cc: addresses.  Would you
> like to be included in the list of recipients for those Git patches, so
> you could, hopefully, provide some feeback?

You may Cc me if you want to, but I can't guarantee I have time or
valuable input to that.

With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

More information about the Linux-rockchip mailing list