[PATCH v5 04/12] arm64: dts: rockchip: Rename regulator for pcie2x1l2 for Radxa ROCK 5C

[FUKAUMI Naoki]

Hi Krzysztof,

Could you please reply to this email?
(Not for me, but for everyone)

Best regards,

--
FUKAUMI Naoki
Radxa Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.

On 12/17/24 10:11, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
> On 12/16/24 22:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 16/12/2024 12:30, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
>>> Use consistent name with other regulators. No functional change.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 3ddf5cdb77e6 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: add Radxa ROCK 5C")
>>> Signed-off-by: FUKAUMI Naoki <naoki at radxa.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v5:
>>> - Reword commit message
>>> Changes in v4:
>>> - reword commit message
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> - none
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - new
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-rock-5c.dts | 6 +++---
>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-rock-5c.dts b/arch/ 
>>> arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-rock-5c.dts
>>> index 85589d1a6d3b..61d75ab503b2 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-rock-5c.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-rock-5c.dts
>>> @@ -76,13 +76,13 @@ pwm-fan {
>>>           pwms = <&pwm3 0 60000 0>;
>>>       };
>>> -    pcie2x1l2_3v3: regulator-pcie2x1l2-3v3 {
>>> +    vcc3v3_pcie2x1l2: regulator-vcc3v3_pcie2x1l2 {
>>
>> No, neither explained, nor correct. See DTS coding style.
>>
>> Please use name for all fixed regulators which matches current format
>> recommendation: 'regulator-[0-9]v[0-9]'
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/ 
>> tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/fixed-regulator.yaml? 
>> h=v6.11-rc1#n46
> 
> 'regulator-[0-9]v[0-9]' is preferred, but 'regulator-[0-9a-z-]+' is also 
> permitted, right?
> 
> i.e. regulator-vcc3v3_pcie2x1l2 should be regulator-vcc3v3-pcie2x1l2
> 
> 
> Or, should we revert below patch and use 'regulator-[0-9]v[0-9]'?
> 
>   https://lore.kernel.org/ 
> all/0ae40493-93e9-40cd-9ca9-990ae064f21a at gmail.com/
> 
> Is 'regulator-0v0' valid?
> Is 'regulator-12v0' invalid?
> 
> How should we handle multiple 1v8/3v3/5v0 regulators?
> 
> Are examples in fixed-regulator.yaml valid?
> 'regulator-name' should be '[0-9]v[0-9]' even if there is same name?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> -- 
> FUKAUMI Naoki
> Radxa Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
> 
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
>