[PATCH 08/16] iommu/fsl: use page allocation function provided by iommu-pages.h
Jason Gunthorpe
jgg at ziepe.ca
Wed Nov 29 12:03:05 PST 2023
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 02:45:03PM -0500, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> > same kind of big systems where IOMMU pagetables would be of any concern.
> > I believe some of the some of the "serious" NICs can easily run up
> > hundreds of megabytes if not gigabytes worth of queues, SKB pools, etc.
> > - would you propose accounting those too?
>
> Yes. Any kind of kernel memory that is proportional to the workload
> should be accountable. Someone is using those resources compared to
> the idling system, and that someone should be charged.
There is a difference between charged and accounted
You should be running around adding GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT, yes. I already
did a bunch of that work. Split that out from this series and send it
to the right maintainers.
Adding a counter for allocations and showing in procfs is a very
different question. IMHO that should not be done in micro, the
threshold to add a new counter should be high.
There is definately room for a generic debugging feature to break down
GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT by owernship somehow. Maybe it can already be done
with BPF. IDK
Jason
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list