[PATCH v3] docs: dt-bindings: add DTS Coding Style document
Francesco Dolcini
francesco at dolcini.it
Wed Nov 29 03:16:23 PST 2023
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 11:19:15AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/11/2023 08:29, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 07:44:22PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> ---
> >> +Following order of properties in device nodes is preferred:
> >> +
> >> +1. compatible
> >> +2. reg
> >> +3. ranges
> >> +4. Standard/common properties (defined by common bindings, e.g. without
> >> + vendor-prefixes)
...
> > On point 4, do you have a more explicit way to define what is an actual
> > standard/common property? You mention the vendor-prefixes as an example,
> > is this just an example or this is the whole definition?
>
> The actual definition is: defined by common bindings, which are:
> meta-schemas and schemas in dtschema, and common bindings per subsystem
> (e.g. leds/common.yaml).
>
> Lack of vendor-prefix is I think 99% accurate in this matter, but there
> are some "linux," ones.
Got it, thanks! I would suggest to incorporate in some way this additional
explanation in v4.
Francesco
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list