[PATCH 3/7] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Fix description and compatible for Radxa CM3i

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 17/01/2023 11:55, Jagan Teki wrote:
> Fix the dt-bindings for Radxa CM3i SoM based boards with proper
> description and compatible strings recommended by Radxa.
> 
> Fixes: ae9fbe0b1f96 ("dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: add Radxa CM3I E25")
> Cc: Chukun Pan <amadeus at jmu.edu.cn>
> Reported-by: FUKAUMI Naoki <naoki at radxa.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> index 3d3c59624483..6f276d787e50 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> @@ -628,11 +628,11 @@ properties:
>            - const: radxa,radxa-cm3   # Radxa Compute Module 3(CM3)
>            - const: rockchip,rk3566
>  
> -      - description: Radxa CM3 Industrial
> +      - description: Radxa Compute Module 3 Industrial(CM3i) SoM based boards
>          items:
>            - enum:
> -              - radxa,e25
> -          - const: radxa,cm3i
> +              - radxa,radxa-e25      # Radxa E25 Carrier Board
> +          - const: radxa,radxa-cm3i  # Radxa Compute Module 3 Industrial(CM3i)

No, it does not match your patch 2/7. It also does not make sense to
duplicate vendor prefix.

Best regards,
Krzysztof