[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: media: rockchip-vpu: Add RK3568 VEPU compatible

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 09/05/2022 11:24, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> On Montag, 9. Mai 2022 09:25:23 CEST Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 08/05/2022 22:25, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
>>> The RK3568 and RK3566 have a Hantro VPU node solely dedicated to
>>> encoding. This patch adds a compatible for it, and also allows
>>> the bindings to only come with a vepu interrupt.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <frattaroli.nicolas at gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml | 2 ++
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml
>>> index bacb60a34989..4045f107ca4e 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml
>>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ properties:
>>>            - rockchip,rk3288-vpu
>>>            - rockchip,rk3328-vpu
>>>            - rockchip,rk3399-vpu
>>> +          - rockchip,rk3568-vepu
>>>            - rockchip,px30-vpu
>>>        - items:
>>>            - const: rockchip,rk3188-vpu
>>> @@ -40,6 +41,7 @@ properties:
>>>    interrupt-names:
>>>      oneOf:
>>>        - const: vdpu
>>> +      - const: vepu
>>
>> This should be enum (for both lines above) and you should add
>> allOf:if:then with a constraints which variant can have which interrupts.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> 
> So something like this?
> 
>   interrupt-names:
>     oneOf:
>       - enum:
>          - vdpu
>          - vepu
>       - items:
>           - const: vepu
>           - const: vdpu

Yes

> 
> What's the difference between a list of consts and an enum here?
> I'm not very familiar with dt-schema, my apologies.

The effect is the same, just oneOf is a bit more complicated way to
describe it.

> 
> Also, since I don't know which of the other variants can have
> the encoding interrupt and this wasn't brought up until now, I think
> my solution will be to have a check for -vepu in the compatible and in
> that case require that only the vepu interrupt is present, if that's
> alright with you.

If you meant by adding a "if" case for only rockchip,rk3568-vepu, it's ok.

Best regards,
Krzysztof