[PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: rename and sort the rk356x usb2 phy handles

[Piotr Oniszczuk]

> 
> Good Evening,
> 
> While I'm not against this idea, my main concern still stands.
> I spent a great deal of thought on this, and decided to go the route I
> did to maintain consistency with previous generations.
> As such, I see one of three paths here:
> - Pull this patch only and depart rk356x from previous SoCs.
> - Do the same for previous SoCs to maintain consistency.
> - Drop this patch to maintain consistency with previous SoCs.
> 
> I ask that others weigh in here, as offline discussion has produced
> mixed results already.

just pure user perspective

(who spent last weeks considerable time to develop DT for rk3566 tvbox. 99% of my work was by reading/learning from other boards existing DT's. Any inconsistencies in DTs makes work for such ppl like me much more harder):

For option 1 - i don't see value
For option 2 - what is reward for extra work needs to be done on all other SoCs?

so option 3 seems to be natural choice...

in other words:

for me:
option 1 brings practically zero value + increased inconsistency.
option 2: extra work - but consistency is like in option 3 (so where is value?)

so option 3 offers the same consistency - but without extra work...
 
just my 0.02$