[PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add RK3566 LubanCat 1

[ty]

Dear Kozlowski,

We just got where we did wrong by reading twice about the
generic-name-recommendation document and comparing our PATCHes with
others. We will make a new PATCH v5 addressing all the comments.

Thanks for your patient. We felt sincerely sorry.

Recards.

Yuteng Zhong, DHDAXCW.

ty <zonyitoo at gmail.com> 于2022年12月21日周三 17:18写道：
>
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org> 于2022年12月21日周三 17:05写道：
> >
> > On 21/12/2022 10:01, ty wrote:
> > > thanks. I am really sorry.
> > >
> > > I fixed this based on your feedback in the PATCH V2 content. Regarding
> > > the dts issue, I used the kernel-5.15 kernel adaptation before, which
> > > may not be perfect at that time.
> >
> > Do not send patches based on v5.15. This is some very old kernel. We do
> > not work on such stuff.
>
> Thank you for your kindly reminder. We have modified the whole .dts
> file based on v6.2 kernel and follow the generic-name-regulation[0] in
> [PATCH v4]. Because it was basically a whole rewrite, so I decided to
> send a new PATCH v4.
>
> [0] https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
>
> >
> > The comment was:
> > "Node names should be generic, so at least with regulator prefix or suffix."
>
> Yes. Node names are all changed in [PATCH v4].