Re: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: Require the YTR modifier for AFBC【请注意,邮件由linux-rockchip-bounces+sandy.huang=rock-chips.com at lists.infradead.org代发】
Huang Jiachai
hjc at rock-chips.com
Fri Feb 26 01:31:34 EST 2021
Hi Daniel,
在 2021/2/25 20:46, Daniel Stone 写道:
> Hi Sandy,
>
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 02:17, Huang Jiachai <hjc at rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> RK3399 and px30 can support YTR afbc format[RGB only], there is an
>> hidden control bit to control this.
> Great, thanks for providing this information!
>
>> Hi Alyssa,
>>
>> Can you add the following patch to test on your platform? thanks.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>> index 99bdb5a2a185..0780ad46230a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
>> #define AFBC_FMT_U8U8U8U8 0x5
>> #define AFBC_FMT_U8U8U8 0x4
>>
>> -#define AFBC_TILE_16x16 BIT(4)
>> +#define AFBC_FMT_YTR BIT(4)
>>
>> /*
>> * The coefficients of the following matrix are all fixed points.
>> @@ -952,7 +952,9 @@ static void vop_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane
>> *plane,
>> if (rockchip_afbc(fb->modifier)) {
>> int afbc_format =
>> vop_convert_afbc_format(fb->format->format);
>>
>> - VOP_AFBC_SET(vop, format, afbc_format | AFBC_TILE_16x16);
>> + if (fb->modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_YTR)
>> + afbc_format |= AFBC_FMT_YTR;
>> + VOP_AFBC_SET(vop, format, afbc_format);
>> VOP_AFBC_SET(vop, hreg_block_split, 0);
>> VOP_AFBC_SET(vop, win_sel, VOP_WIN_TO_INDEX(vop_win));
>> VOP_AFBC_SET(vop, hdr_ptr, dma_addr);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.h
>> index 4a2099cb582e..48e131b88c23 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.h
>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>> #define ROCKCHIP_AFBC_MOD \
>> DRM_FORMAT_MOD_ARM_AFBC( \
>> AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_16x16 | AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_SPARSE \
>> + | AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_YTR \
>> )
> Looks good - this will help us confirm. I think the complete patch
> though would advertise both YTR and non-YTR modifiers: per Arm's
> recommendation, it sounds like [AX]RGB8888 formats should only
> advertise the non-YTR variant, and [AX]BGR8888 should advertise both
> variants. Does that make sense?
yes, RGB format have YTR and non-YTR variant, YUV format only have
non-YTR variant.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
>
>
>
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list