[RFC 0/5] arm64: imx8mm: Enable Hantro VPUs
Adam Ford
aford173 at gmail.com
Fri Dec 17 05:15:00 PST 2021
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:49 PM Ezequiel Garcia
<ezequiel at vanguardiasur.com.ar> wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> >
> > I will post a V2 last today with the Mini's post-processing removed.
> > Someone, I apologize that I forget who, mentioned it was fused out of
> > the Mini, so the testing I've been doing was with that removed and I
> > removed the H1 encoder since the Mini doesn't support JPEG encoding.
> >
> [...]
>
> Resurrecting this thread here. IMX8MMRM Rev. 0, 02/2019 mentions
> post-processor features for G1 and G2.
>
> Have you checked the fuse and synth registers to see if they throw
> any useful information about the hardware? For instance,
> comparing PP fuse register (SWREG99) and
> Synthesis configuration register post-processor (SWREG100)
> in both 8MQ and 8MM could be useful.
>
> As I mentioned on my previous mail, even if G1 PP is disabled
> on the Mini, I would imagine the G2 can do linear NV12 (aka raster-scan)
> which in our hantro driver jargon is a "post-processed" format :-)
You're likely right. I was going on memory from an e-mail from
Nicloas Defresne who wrote:
"I will check the patchset, but you need in the mini-variant to disable the G1
post processor, because this block was fused out. We didn't make it optional
from the start as according to the V1 of the TRM it was there, but that error
was corrected in V3."
In my head I assumed the G2 was affected as well, but when I double
checked his email, and based on the above statement, the G2
post-processing is probably there, so I'll run some tests with the G2
post-processing enabled. I'll also double check those registers on
both to confirm what they read. I am not sure when I'll have time
because I leave for London next week, and I won't return until early
January, but I'll do what I can.
adam
>
> Thanks,
> Ezequiel
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list