[PATCH] PCI: rockchip-dwc: Potential error pointer dereference in probe
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Fri Aug 13 08:53:50 PDT 2021
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 06:45:05PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 03:32:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 03:01:10PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > Indeed I've thought before that it would be nice if regulators worked like
> > > GPIOs, where the absence of an optional one does give you NULL, and most of
> > > the API is also NULL-safe. Probably a pretty big job though...
> > It also encourages *really* bad practice with error handling
> I'm not necessarily 100% positive what you mean by this. I think you
> mean you don't like when people pass invalid pointers to free functions?
No, it's the case where people don't bother checking if they got the
regulator in the first place, don't bother checking if when they tried
to enable the regulator that actually worked, and don't do whatever
extra handling they need to do to configure the system for the fact that
one of the power supplies is missing. It really only helps in the case
where you can just ignore the regulator completely.
> But making regulator code NULL-safe wouldn't affect error handling
> because NULL wouldn't be an error.
>
> p = get_optional();
> if (IS_ERR(p))
> return PTR_ERR(p);
> enable(p);
Your example already misses the error handling on enable...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/attachments/20210813/4def6804/attachment.sig>
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list