[PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: pwm: add more compatible strings to pwm-rockchip.yaml

Johan Jonker jbx6244 at gmail.com
Mon Apr 12 18:54:19 BST 2021


Hi,

Sorry, made a little mistake in version 2 with "rockchip,rk3036-pwm",
"rockchip,rk2928-pwm".
Please trash. Will send version 3.
By the change of schema for clocks and clock-names I add
"rockchip,rk3328-pwm" to the "if:", so strictly speaking v1 and (v2) v3
will not be the same.

Johan


On 4/12/21 5:05 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 15:10:03 +0200, Johan Jonker wrote:
>> The compatible strings below are already in use in the Rockchip
>> dtsi files, but were somehow never added to a document, so add
>>
>> "rockchip,rk3328-pwm"
>>
>> "rockchip,rk3036-pwm", "rockchip,rk2928-pwm"
>>
>> "rockchip,rk3368-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm"
>> "rockchip,rk3399-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm"
>>
>> "rockchip,px30-pwm", "rockchip,rk3328-pwm"
>> "rockchip,rk3308-pwm", "rockchip,rk3328-pwm"
>>
>> for pwm nodes to pwm-rockchip.yaml.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244 at gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Changed V2:
>>   changed schema for clocks and clock-names
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml | 9 +++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
> 
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> 




More information about the Linux-rockchip mailing list