[PATCH v3] dt-bindings: power: rockchip: Convert to json-schema
Enric Balletbo i Serra
enric.balletbo at collabora.com
Sun Oct 11 05:56:05 EDT 2020
Hi Rob,
Many thanks for your comments, some questions below.
On 7/10/20 17:11, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:29:51AM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>> Convert the soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt binding document to json-schema
>> and move to the power bindings directory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo at collabora.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Fixed tab errors found by bot
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Fixed a warning that says that 'syscon' should not be used alone.
>> - Use patternProperties to define a new level for power-domains.
>> - Add const values for power-domain-cells, address-cells, etc.
>>
>> .../power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml | 207 ++++++++++++++++++
>> .../bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt | 136 ------------
>> 2 files changed, 207 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml
>> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..b23ea37e2a08
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: Rockchip Power Domains
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> + - Caesar Wang <wxt at rock-chips.com>
>> + - Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de>
>> +
>> +description: |
>> + Rockchip processors include support for multiple power domains which can be
>> + powered up/down by software based on different application scenes to save power.
>> +
>> + Power domains contained within power-controller node are generic power domain
>> + providers documented in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml.
>> +
>> + IP cores belonging to a power domain should contain a 'power-domains'
>> + property that is a phandle for the power domain node representing the domain.
>> +
>> +properties:
>> + $nodename:
>> + const: power-controller
>> +
>> + compatible:
>> + enum:
>> + - rockchip,px30-power-controller
>> + - rockchip,rk3036-power-controller
>> + - rockchip,rk3066-power-controller
>> + - rockchip,rk3128-power-controller
>> + - rockchip,rk3188-power-controller
>> + - rockchip,rk3228-power-controller
>> + - rockchip,rk3288-power-controller
>> + - rockchip,rk3328-power-controller
>> + - rockchip,rk3366-power-controller
>> + - rockchip,rk3368-power-controller
>> + - rockchip,rk3399-power-controller
>> +
>> + '#power-domain-cells':
>> + const: 1
>> +
>> + '#address-cells':
>> + const: 1
>> +
>> + '#size-cells':
>> + const: 0
>> +
>> +patternProperties:
>> + "^power-domain@[0-9]+$":
>
> unit-addresses are hex.
>
As explained in the description of 'reg' is more a power domain index than a
hexadecimal address. Same as done in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/fsl,imx-gpcv2.yaml
Use hex pattern will give a lot of errors, i.e 'pd_edp at 25' and many others will
not match the regexes '^power-domain@[0-9a-f]+$'
Is the hex notation a must here? In that case, I assume I should change all the
power/rk3*power.h includes to use that notation.
>> + type: object
>> + description: |
>> + Represents the power domains within the power controller node as documented
>> + in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml.
>> +
>> + properties:
>> +
>> + '#power-domain-cells':
>> + description:
>> + Must be 0 for nodes representing a single PM domain and 1 for nodes
>> + providing multiple PM domains.
>> +
>> + '#address-cells':
>> + const: 1
>> +
>> + '#size-cells':
>> + const: 0
>> +
>> + reg:
>> + description: |
>> + Power domain index. Valid values are defined in:
>> + "include/dt-bindings/power/px30-power.h" - for PX30 type power domain.
>> + "include/dt-bindings/power/rk3036-power.h" - for RK3036 type power domain.
>> + "include/dt-bindings/power/rk3066-power.h" - for RK3066 type power domain.
>> + "include/dt-bindings/power/rk3128-power.h" - for RK3128 type power domain.
>> + "include/dt-bindings/power/rk3188-power.h" - for RK3188 type power domain.
>> + "include/dt-bindings/power/rk3228-power.h" - for RK3228 type power domain.
>> + "include/dt-bindings/power/rk3288-power.h" - for RK3288 type power domain.
>> + "include/dt-bindings/power/rk3328-power.h" - for RK3328 type power domain.
>> + "include/dt-bindings/power/rk3366-power.h" - for RK3366 type power domain.
>> + "include/dt-bindings/power/rk3368-power.h" - for RK3368 type power domain.
>> + "include/dt-bindings/power/rk3399-power.h" - for RK3399 type power domain.
>> + maxItems: 1
>
> Range of values?
>
>> +
>> + clocks:
>> + description: |
>> + A number of phandles to clocks that need to be enabled while power domain
>> + switches state.
>
> Can you at least put a range of how many clocks?
>
minItems could be 0, but from the datasheet, I am not sure if I am able to
define a maxItems, I think I can do two things, or define a maxItems based on
current definitions (with the risk that if a new SoC is supported we should
change that number) or use a finger in the air "safe" value. Should any of these
solutions be acceptable for you?
>> +
>> + pm_qos:
>> + description: |
>> + A number of phandles to qos blocks which need to be saved and restored
>> + while power domain switches state.
>
> And here.
>
The same as clocks here.
>> +
>> + required:
>> + - reg
>
> additionalProperties: false
>
> Which in turn means the nested power domains will throw an error, so you
> can do:
>
> patternProperties:
> "^power-domain@[0-9a-f]+$":
> $ref: '#/patternProperties/^power-domain@[0-9a-f]+$'
>
>> +
>> +required:
>> + - compatible
>> + - '#power-domain-cells'
>> +
>> +additionalProperties: false
>> +
>> +examples:
>> + - |
>> + #include <dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h>
>> + #include <dt-bindings/power/rk3399-power.h>
>> +
>> + soc {
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>> +
>> + qos_hdcp: qos at ffa90000 {
>> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-qos","syscon";
>
> space ^
>
>> + reg = <0x0 0xffa90000 0x0 0x20>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + qos_iep: qos at ffa98000 {
>> + compatible = "rk3399-qos","syscon";
>> + reg = <0x0 0xffa98000 0x0 0x20>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + qos_rga_r: qos at ffab0000 {
>> + compatible = "rk3399-qos","syscon";
>> + reg = <0x0 0xffab0000 0x0 0x20>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + qos_rga_w: qos at ffab0080 {
>> + compatible = "rk3399-qos","syscon";
>> + reg = <0x0 0xffab0080 0x0 0x20>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + qos_video_m0: qos at ffab8000 {
>> + compatible = "rk3399-qos","syscon";
>> + reg = <0x0 0xffab8000 0x0 0x20>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + qos_video_m1_r: qos at ffac0000 {
>> + compatible = "rk3399-qos","syscon";
>> + reg = <0x0 0xffac0000 0x0 0x20>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + qos_video_m1_w: qos at ffac0080 {
>> + compatible = "rk3399-qos","syscon";
>> + reg = <0x0 0xffac0080 0x0 0x20>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + power-management at ff310000 {
>> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-pmu", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
>> + reg = <0x0 0xff310000 0x0 0x1000>;
>> +
>> + power-controller {
>> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-power-controller";
>> + #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + /* These power domains are grouped by VD_CENTER */
>> + power-domain at RK3399_PD_IEP {
>> + reg = <RK3399_PD_IEP>;
>> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_IEP>,
>> + <&cru HCLK_IEP>;
>> + pm_qos = <&qos_iep>;
>> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>> + power-domain at RK3399_PD_RGA {
>> + reg = <RK3399_PD_RGA>;
>> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_RGA>,
>> + <&cru HCLK_RGA>;
>> + pm_qos = <&qos_rga_r>,
>> + <&qos_rga_w>;
>> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>> + power-domain at RK3399_PD_VCODEC {
>> + reg = <RK3399_PD_VCODEC>;
>> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_VCODEC>,
>> + <&cru HCLK_VCODEC>;
>> + pm_qos = <&qos_video_m0>;
>> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>> + power-domain at RK3399_PD_VDU {
>> + reg = <RK3399_PD_VDU>;
>> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_VDU>,
>> + <&cru HCLK_VDU>;
>> + pm_qos = <&qos_video_m1_r>,
>> + <&qos_video_m1_w>;
>> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>> + power-domain at RK3399_PD_VIO {
>> + reg = <RK3399_PD_VIO>;
>> + #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + power-domain at RK3399_PD_HDCP {
>> + reg = <RK3399_PD_HDCP>;
>> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_HDCP>,
>> + <&cru HCLK_HDCP>,
>> + <&cru PCLK_HDCP>;
>> + pm_qos = <&qos_hdcp>;
>> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list