[PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Assign a fixed index to mmc devices on rk3399-roc-pc boards.
Heiko Stübner
heiko at sntech.de
Wed Nov 4 05:51:17 EST 2020
Hi Markus,
Am Mittwoch, 4. November 2020, 10:49:45 CET schrieb Markus Reichl:
> Recently introduced async probe on mmc devices can shuffle block IDs.
> Pin them to fixed values to ease booting in evironments where UUIDs
> are not practical. Use newly introduced aliases for mmcblk devices from [1].
>
> [1]
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11747669/
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Reichl <m.reichl at fivetechno.de>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi
> index e7a459fa4322..bc9482b59428 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi
> @@ -13,6 +13,11 @@ / {
> model = "Firefly ROC-RK3399-PC Board";
> compatible = "firefly,roc-rk3399-pc", "rockchip,rk3399";
>
> + aliases {
> + mmc0 = &sdmmc;
> + mmc1 = &sdhci;
> + };
> +
Any reason for this odering?
I.e. some previous incarnations had it ordered as (emmc, mmc, sdio).
This is also true for the ChromeOS out-of-tree usage of those, the
rk3399 dts in the chromeos-4.4 tree also orders this as sdhci, sdmmc, sdio.
And I guess a further question would be when we're doing arbitary orderings
anyway, why is this not in rk3399.dtsi ;-) ?
Heiko
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list