USB3 regression in RK3399
Enric Balletbo i Serra
enric.balletbo at collabora.com
Thu Feb 22 01:10:14 PST 2018
On 22/02/18 00:04, Vicente Bergas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:17 PM, Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de> wrote:
>> Hi Vicente,
>> Am Mittwoch, 21. Februar 2018, 22:58:35 CET schrieb Vicente Bergas:
>>> testing on the Sapphire board, which uses the RK3399 SoC, a regression
>>> has been found in v4.16-rc2 wrt v4.15.4 regarding the USB3 type-A port:
>>> In v4.15.4 it works in USB2-only mode.
>>> In v4.16-rc2 it does not work.
>>> It has been tested with a USB2 hub with 3 devices connected:
>>> a keyboard (USB1.1), a mouse (USB2) and a rtlwifi dongle (USB2).
>>> It has also been tested with a USB3-to-SATA converter. This one is not
>>> working in v4.15.4 nor in v4.16-rc2.
>>> I have also tried the 6-patch series from Enric Balletbo i Serra
>>> "[PATCH v3 3/6] phy: rockchip-typec: enable usb3 host during usb3 phy power on"
>>> with the same result.
>>> During boot, the following message appears a few times:
>>> "dwc3: failed to initialize core"
>>> The kernel configuration is:
>>> Is that a configuration issue, a bug in the kernel or something else?
>>> If it is a configuration issue, what should be changed?
>>> If it is a bug, can it be fixed?
>> Hmm, I'd guess the main issue would be a missing typec-phy driver
>> in your kernel (see drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
>> But even with this driver, I realize that we'll be missing the extcon
>> driver telling the driver about the cable state. ChromeOS devices
>> get the cable-state from the embedded controller via the extcon
>> interface and while other boards seem to use the fusb302 chip
>> for power-delivery, the driver currently does not seem to
>> utilize the extcon interface for something like this.
>> Also, right now the rockchip typec-phy does fail probing when no
>> extcon is detected, but shouldn't it just fall back to working in host-
>> mode if it cannot get the extcon, or the device just routes everything
>> to a standard usb3 port?
> Hi Heiko,
> by comparison the kernel configuration that works (partially,
> usb2-only) with v4.15.4 is
> all the parameters CONFIG_*TYPEC*, CONFIG_*FUSB302*,
> CONFIG_*PHY*ROCKCHIP* and CONFIG_*EXTCON* are the same among the two.
> So, I suspect the difference should lay somewhere else.
> Has Type-C anything to do with Type-A?
I suspect that what Heiko says is right and typec-phy fails probing. Could you
copy your dmesg output somewhere?
More information about the Linux-rockchip