[PATCH] drm/rockchip: Fix memory leak in rockchip_drm_sys_resume()

jeffy jeffy.chen at rock-chips.com
Wed Sep 27 20:16:38 PDT 2017

Hi Sean,

On 09/28/2017 04:27 AM, Sean Paul wrote:
>> >@@ -299,6 +300,7 @@ static int rockchip_drm_sys_resume(struct device *dev)
>> >
>> >  	priv = drm->dev_private;
>> >  	drm_atomic_helper_resume(drm, priv->state);
>> >+	drm_atomic_state_put(priv->state);
> Won't this be freed for you eventually in commit_tail()?
i think the drm_atomic_state_put in commit_tail is paired to the 
drm_atomic_state_get in drm_atomic_helper_commit.

and the kmemleak shows(after a few suspend/resume):

     unreferenced object 0xffffffc0ce0fa400 (size 256):
         [<ffffffc00034a9a8>] __save_stack_trace+0x48/0x6c
         [<ffffffc00034b088>] create_object+0x138/0x254
         [<ffffffc0009d5504>] kmemleak_alloc+0x58/0x8c
         [<ffffffc000345f78>] __kmalloc+0x1d4/0x2a0
         [<ffffffc0006765bc>] usb_alloc_urb+0x30/0x60
         [<ffffffbffc128598>] alloc_ctrl_urb+0x38/0x120 [btusb]
         [<ffffffbffc129e7c>] btusb_send_frame+0x64/0xf8 [btusb]

checking the current code, i saw only i915/intel_display.c has this 
drm_atomic_state_put for the state allocated by 
drm_atomic_helper_suspend(), there're many drivers missing that(or maybe 
they free it in some other way?)

> Sean

More information about the Linux-rockchip mailing list