[PATCH v3] PCI: use IDA to manage domain number if not getting it from DT
Shawn Lin
shawn.lin at rock-chips.com
Tue May 23 00:45:11 PDT 2017
If not getting domain number from DT, the domain number will
keep increasing once doing unbind/bind RC drivers. This could
introduce pointless tree view of lspci as shows below:
-+-[0001:00]---00.0-[01]----00.0
\-[0000:00]-
The more test we do, the lengthier it would be. The more serious
issue is that if attaching two hierarchies for two different domains
belonging to two root bridges, so when doing unbind/bind test for one
of them and keep the other, then the domain number would finally
overflow and make the two hierarchies of devices share the some domain
number but actually they shouldn't. So it looks like we need to invent
a new indexing ID mechanism to manage domain number. This patch
introduces idr to achieve our purpose.
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris at chromium.org>
Cc: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen at rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin at rock-chips.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- make ida_domain a system-wide property and check it in the code to
combine with use_dt_domains. Also update the comment there.
Changes in v2:
- add a remove wrapper
- rename use_dt_domains to ida_domain and set this bit
in pci_get_new_domain_nr and test it in the remove wrapper.
drivers/pci/pci.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
drivers/pci/remove.c | 2 ++
include/linux/pci.h | 8 ++++++--
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index b01bd5b..e5f5db0 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/dmi.h>
+#include <linux/idr.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_pci.h>
@@ -5340,15 +5341,25 @@ static void pci_no_domains(void)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS
-static atomic_t __domain_nr = ATOMIC_INIT(-1);
+DEFINE_IDA(__domain_nr);
-int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void)
+/* get domain number from IDA */
+static bool ida_domain = true;
+
+int pci_get_new_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus)
+{
+ return ida_simple_get(&__domain_nr, 0, sizeof(u64), GFP_KERNEL);
+}
+
+void pci_put_old_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus)
{
- return atomic_inc_return(&__domain_nr);
+ if (ida_domain)
+ ida_simple_remove(&__domain_nr, bus->domain_nr);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
-static int of_pci_bus_find_domain_nr(struct device *parent)
+static int of_pci_bus_find_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus,
+ struct device *parent)
{
static int use_dt_domains = -1;
int domain = -1;
@@ -5361,19 +5372,21 @@ static int of_pci_bus_find_domain_nr(struct device *parent)
* If DT domain property is valid (domain >= 0) and
* use_dt_domains != 0, the DT assignment is valid since this means
* we have not previously allocated a domain number by using
- * pci_get_new_domain_nr(); we should also update use_dt_domains to
- * 1, to indicate that we have just assigned a domain number from
- * DT.
+ * pci_get_new_domain_nr(), so we should set ida_domain to false to
+ * indicate that we don't allocate domain from idr; we should also
+ * update use_dt_domains to 1, to indicate that we have just assigned
+ * a domain number from DT.
*
* If DT domain property value is not valid (ie domain < 0), and we
* have not previously assigned a domain number from DT
- * (use_dt_domains != 1) we should assign a domain number by
- * using the:
+ * (use_dt_domains != 1 && ida_domain != false) we should assign a
+ * domain number by using the:
*
* pci_get_new_domain_nr()
*
- * API and update the use_dt_domains value to keep track of method we
- * are using to assign domain numbers (use_dt_domains = 0).
+ * API and update the use_dt_domains and ida_domain value to keep track
+ * of method we are using to assign domain numbers (use_dt_domains = 0
+ * and ida_domain = true).
*
* All other combinations imply we have a platform that is trying
* to mix domain numbers obtained from DT and pci_get_new_domain_nr(),
@@ -5383,9 +5396,10 @@ static int of_pci_bus_find_domain_nr(struct device *parent)
*/
if (domain >= 0 && use_dt_domains) {
use_dt_domains = 1;
- } else if (domain < 0 && use_dt_domains != 1) {
+ ida_domain = false;
+ } else if (domain < 0 && use_dt_domains != 1 && ida_domain != false) {
use_dt_domains = 0;
- domain = pci_get_new_domain_nr();
+ domain = pci_get_new_domain_nr(bus);
} else {
dev_err(parent, "Node %s has inconsistent \"linux,pci-domain\" property in DT\n",
parent->of_node->full_name);
@@ -5397,7 +5411,7 @@ static int of_pci_bus_find_domain_nr(struct device *parent)
int pci_bus_find_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent)
{
- return acpi_disabled ? of_pci_bus_find_domain_nr(parent) :
+ return acpi_disabled ? of_pci_bus_find_domain_nr(bus, parent) :
acpi_pci_bus_find_domain_nr(bus);
}
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/pci/remove.c b/drivers/pci/remove.c
index 73a03d3..1bbbb37 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/remove.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/remove.c
@@ -157,6 +157,8 @@ void pci_remove_root_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
list_for_each_entry_safe(child, tmp,
&bus->devices, bus_list)
pci_remove_bus_device(child);
+
+ pci_put_old_domain_nr(bus);
pci_remove_bus(bus);
host_bridge->bus = NULL;
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index 33c2b0b..9296e31 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -1445,13 +1445,17 @@ static inline int pci_enable_ptm(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 *granularity)
* configuration space.
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS
+extern struct ida __domain_nr;
extern int pci_domains_supported;
-int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void);
+int pci_get_new_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus);
+void pci_put_old_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus);
#else
enum { pci_domains_supported = 0 };
static inline int pci_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) { return 0; }
static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) { return 0; }
-static inline int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void) { return -ENOSYS; }
+static inline int pci_get_new_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus)
+{ return -ENOSYS; }
+static inline void pci_put_old_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) { }
#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS */
/*
--
1.9.1
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list