[PATCH v3 1/3] SoC: es8328-i2c: Add compatible for ES8323
romain.perier at collabora.com
Thu May 18 23:56:53 PDT 2017
Le 16/05/2017 à 13:18, Mark Brown a écrit :
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 04:41:38PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:22:25PM +0200, Romain Perier wrote:
>>> This commit adds a compatible string for everest,es8323. This is an
>>> audio codec that is compatible with es8328 and can be found for example
>>> on the Firefly-RK3288 board.
>> If it is compatible with the es8328, then that should be a fallback and
>> you don't need the driver change.
> While people don't strictly need the driver change it doesn't do any
> harm either and encourages people to get the information into the DT
> that it's a different chip. Thinking about it it might be good to have
> a way for something to validate if fallback compatibles are being listed
> when they should - the drivers could provide the information fairly
> easily I guess, or it could go into the binding docs once we have a
> schema format.
> Even if it doesn't currently make a difference to software I'd rather
> get the information in there for mixed signal devices like audio CODECs
> - it's not that unknown to find later that supposedly register identical
> chips have some differences in the analog which we want to care about.
So, what should I do for this patch, finally ? fallback or driver change ?
More information about the Linux-rockchip