[patch 2/5] genirq: Move bus locking into __setup_irq()

[Thomas Gleixner]

There is no point in having the irq_bus_lock() protection around all
callers to __setup_irq().

Move it into __setup_irq(). This is also a preparatory patch for addressing
the issues with the irq resource callbacks.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
---
 kernel/irq/manage.c |   13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -1167,6 +1167,8 @@ static int
 	if (desc->irq_data.chip->flags & IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE)
 		new->flags &= ~IRQF_ONESHOT;
 
+	chip_bus_lock(desc);
+
 	/*
 	 * The following block of code has to be executed atomically
 	 */
@@ -1347,6 +1349,7 @@ static int
 	}
 
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
+	chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
 
 	irq_setup_timings(desc, new);
 
@@ -1378,6 +1381,8 @@ static int
 out_unlock:
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
 
+	chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
+
 out_thread:
 	if (new->thread) {
 		struct task_struct *t = new->thread;
@@ -1417,9 +1422,7 @@ int setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct i
 	if (retval < 0)
 		return retval;
 
-	chip_bus_lock(desc);
 	retval = __setup_irq(irq, desc, act);
-	chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
 
 	if (retval)
 		irq_chip_pm_put(&desc->irq_data);
@@ -1674,9 +1677,7 @@ int request_threaded_irq(unsigned int ir
 		return retval;
 	}
 
-	chip_bus_lock(desc);
 	retval = __setup_irq(irq, desc, action);
-	chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
 
 	if (retval) {
 		irq_chip_pm_put(&desc->irq_data);
@@ -1924,9 +1925,7 @@ int setup_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, s
 	if (retval < 0)
 		return retval;
 
-	chip_bus_lock(desc);
 	retval = __setup_irq(irq, desc, act);
-	chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
 
 	if (retval)
 		irq_chip_pm_put(&desc->irq_data);
@@ -1980,9 +1979,7 @@ int request_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq,
 		return retval;
 	}
 
-	chip_bus_lock(desc);
 	retval = __setup_irq(irq, desc, action);
-	chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
 
 	if (retval) {
 		irq_chip_pm_put(&desc->irq_data);