[PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: dw_mmc-rockchip: parse rockchip,desired-num-phases from DT

Jaehoon Chung jh80.chung at samsung.com
Thu Jun 29 02:47:29 PDT 2017


Hi Shawn,

On 06/29/2017 10:38 AM, Shawn Lin wrote:
> Hi Jaehoon,
> 
> On 2017/5/18 10:20, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>> Hi Shawn,
>>
>> On 05/16/2017 03:28 PM, Shawn Lin wrote:
>>> Currently we unconditionally do tuning for each degree, which
>>> costs 900ms for each boot and resume.
>>>
>>> May someone argue that this is a question of accuracy VS time. But I
>>> would say it's a trick of how we need to do decision for our boards.
>>> If we don't care the time we spend at all, we could definitely do tuning
>>> for each degree. But when we need to improve the user experience, for
>>> instance, speed up resuming from S3, we should also have the right to
>>> do that. This patch add parsing "rockchip,desired-num-phases", for folks
>>> to specify the number of doing tuning. If not specified, 360 will be used
>>> as before.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin at rock-chips.com>
>>
>> Will pick this patch with [PATCH 1/2] after getting acked tags from DT guys.
>>
> 
> patch 1 was acked by Rob, so I assume these two are material for 4.13?

Sorry for late..Will pick and PR..Thanks!

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

> 
>> Best Regards,
>> Jaehoon Chung
>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - rename property to rockchip,desired-num-phases
>>>
>>>   drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>>>   1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c
>>> index 372fb6e..a3f1c2b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c
>>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ struct dw_mci_rockchip_priv_data {
>>>       struct clk        *drv_clk;
>>>       struct clk        *sample_clk;
>>>       int            default_sample_phase;
>>> +    int            num_phases;
>>>   };
>>>     static void dw_mci_rk3288_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios)
>>> @@ -133,8 +134,8 @@ static void dw_mci_rk3288_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios)
>>>       }
>>>   }
>>>   -#define NUM_PHASES            360
>>> -#define TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(i)    (DIV_ROUND_UP((i) * 360, NUM_PHASES))
>>> +#define TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(i, num_phases) \
>>> +        (DIV_ROUND_UP((i) * 360, num_phases))
>>>     static int dw_mci_rk3288_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 opcode)
>>>   {
>>> @@ -159,13 +160,15 @@ static int dw_mci_rk3288_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 opcode)
>>>           return -EIO;
>>>       }
>>>   -    ranges = kmalloc_array(NUM_PHASES / 2 + 1, sizeof(*ranges), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +    ranges = kmalloc_array(priv->num_phases / 2 + 1,
>>> +                   sizeof(*ranges), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>       if (!ranges)
>>>           return -ENOMEM;
>>>         /* Try each phase and extract good ranges */
>>> -    for (i = 0; i < NUM_PHASES; ) {
>>> -        clk_set_phase(priv->sample_clk, TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(i));
>>> +    for (i = 0; i < priv->num_phases; ) {
>>> +        clk_set_phase(priv->sample_clk,
>>> +                  TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(i, priv->num_phases));
>>>             v = !mmc_send_tuning(mmc, opcode, NULL);
>>>   @@ -179,7 +182,7 @@ static int dw_mci_rk3288_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 opcode)
>>>           if (v) {
>>>               ranges[range_count-1].end = i;
>>>               i++;
>>> -        } else if (i == NUM_PHASES - 1) {
>>> +        } else if (i == priv->num_phases - 1) {
>>>               /* No extra skipping rules if we're at the end */
>>>               i++;
>>>           } else {
>>> @@ -188,11 +191,11 @@ static int dw_mci_rk3288_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 opcode)
>>>                * one since testing bad phases is slow.  Skip
>>>                * 20 degrees.
>>>                */
>>> -            i += DIV_ROUND_UP(20 * NUM_PHASES, 360);
>>> +            i += DIV_ROUND_UP(20 * priv->num_phases, 360);
>>>                 /* Always test the last one */
>>> -            if (i >= NUM_PHASES)
>>> -                i = NUM_PHASES - 1;
>>> +            if (i >= priv->num_phases)
>>> +                i = priv->num_phases - 1;
>>>           }
>>>             prev_v = v;
>>> @@ -210,7 +213,7 @@ static int dw_mci_rk3288_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 opcode)
>>>           range_count--;
>>>       }
>>>   -    if (ranges[0].start == 0 && ranges[0].end == NUM_PHASES - 1) {
>>> +    if (ranges[0].start == 0 && ranges[0].end == priv->num_phases - 1) {
>>>           clk_set_phase(priv->sample_clk, priv->default_sample_phase);
>>>           dev_info(host->dev, "All phases work, using default phase %d.",
>>>                priv->default_sample_phase);
>>> @@ -222,7 +225,7 @@ static int dw_mci_rk3288_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 opcode)
>>>           int len = (ranges[i].end - ranges[i].start + 1);
>>>             if (len < 0)
>>> -            len += NUM_PHASES;
>>> +            len += priv->num_phases;
>>>             if (longest_range_len < len) {
>>>               longest_range_len = len;
>>> @@ -230,25 +233,30 @@ static int dw_mci_rk3288_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 opcode)
>>>           }
>>>             dev_dbg(host->dev, "Good phase range %d-%d (%d len)\n",
>>> -            TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(ranges[i].start),
>>> -            TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(ranges[i].end),
>>> +            TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(ranges[i].start,
>>> +                          priv->num_phases),
>>> +            TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(ranges[i].end,
>>> +                          priv->num_phases),
>>>               len
>>>           );
>>>       }
>>>         dev_dbg(host->dev, "Best phase range %d-%d (%d len)\n",
>>> -        TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(ranges[longest_range].start),
>>> -        TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(ranges[longest_range].end),
>>> +        TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(ranges[longest_range].start,
>>> +                      priv->num_phases),
>>> +        TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(ranges[longest_range].end,
>>> +                      priv->num_phases),
>>>           longest_range_len
>>>       );
>>>         middle_phase = ranges[longest_range].start + longest_range_len / 2;
>>> -    middle_phase %= NUM_PHASES;
>>> +    middle_phase %= priv->num_phases;
>>>       dev_info(host->dev, "Successfully tuned phase to %d\n",
>>> -         TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(middle_phase));
>>> +         TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(middle_phase, priv->num_phases));
>>>         clk_set_phase(priv->sample_clk,
>>> -              TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(middle_phase));
>>> +              TUNING_ITERATION_TO_PHASE(middle_phase,
>>> +                        priv->num_phases));
>>>     free:
>>>       kfree(ranges);
>>> @@ -264,6 +272,10 @@ static int dw_mci_rk3288_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host)
>>>       if (!priv)
>>>           return -ENOMEM;
>>>   +    if (of_property_read_u32(np, "rockchip,desired-num-phases",
>>> +                    &priv->num_phases))
>>> +        priv->num_phases = 360;
>>> +
>>>       if (of_property_read_u32(np, "rockchip,default-sample-phase",
>>>                       &priv->default_sample_phase))
>>>           priv->default_sample_phase = 0;
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-rockchip mailing list
>> Linux-rockchip at lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
>>
>>
>>
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 
> 




More information about the Linux-rockchip mailing list