[RFC] V4L2 unified low-level decoder API
Randy Li
randy.li at rock-chips.com
Fri Nov 4 19:44:22 PDT 2016
On 11/04/2016 09:55 PM, Hugues FRUCHET wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> thanks for reply, some comments below:
>
>
> On 10/27/2016 03:08 AM, Randy Li wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/26/2016 11:09 PM, Hugues FRUCHET wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This RFC aims to start discussions in order to define the codec specific
>>> controls structures to fulfill the low-level decoder API needed by non
>>> “Stream API” based decoders (“stateless” or “Frame API” based decoders).
>>>
>>> Several implementation exists now which runs on several SoC and various
>>> software frameworks.
>>>
>>> The idea is to find the communalities between all those implementations
>>> and SoC to define a single unified interface in V4L2 includes.
>>>
>>> Even if “Request API” is needed to pass those codec specific controls
>>> from userspace down to kernel on a per-buffer basis, we can start
>>> discussions and define the controls in parallel of its development.
>> Yes, I have sent a one for H.264 decoder and JPEG encoder.
>>>
>>> We can even propose some implementations based on existing V4L2 control
>>> framework (which doesn’t support “per-frame” basis) by ensuring
>>> atomicity of sequence S_EXT_CTRL(header[i])/QBUF(stream[i]). Constraint
>>> can then be relaxed when “Request API” is merged.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I would like to propose to work on a “per-codec” basis, having at least
>>> 2 different SoC and 2 different frameworks to test and validate controls.
>>>
>>> To do so, I have tried to identify some people that have worked on this
>>> subject and have proposed some implementations, feel free to correct me
>>> and enhance the list if needed:
>>>
>>> * MPEG2/MPEG4
>>>
>>> - Florent Revest for Allwinner A13 CedarX support [1] tested with VLC
>>> -> libVA + sunxi-cedrus-drv-video -> V4L2
>>>
>>> - Myself for STMicroelectronics Delta support [2] tested with
>>> GStreamer V4L2 -> libv4l2 + libv4l-delta plugin -> V4L2
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * VP8
>>>
>>> - Pawel Osciak for Rockchip RK3288, RK3399? VPU Support [3] tested with
>>> Chromium -> V4L2
>>>
>>> - Jung Zhao for Rockchip RK3288 VPU support [4] <cannot find the
>>> framework used>
>> There is rockchip VDPAU driver supporting it, but it is .
>
> Could you point out the code that is used ? Which application is used on
> top of VDPAU ?
https://github.com/rockchip-linux/libvdpau-rockchip
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * H264
>>>
>>> - Pawel Osciak for Rockchip RK3288, RK3399? VPU Support [5] tested with
>>> Chromium -> V4L2
>>>
>>> - Randy Li for Rockchip RK3288 VPU support [6] tested with VLC? ->
>>> libVA + rockchip-va-driver -> V4L2
>> I only tested it with Gstreamer -> VA-API element -> Rockchip VA-API
>> driver -> V4L2
>
> OK got it, thks !
>
>>>
>>> VLC?
>>> -> libVDPAU + rockchip-va-driver -> V4L2
>>>
>>> I can work to define MPEG2/MPEG4 controls and propose functional
>>> implementations for those codecs, and will be glad to co-work with you
>>> Florent.
>> But it may not work with Rockchip's SoC, you may check the following branch
>> https://github.com/hizukiayaka/rockchip-video-driver/tree/rk_v4l2_mix
>
> I have checked code and I have only found H264 support, do I miss
> something ?
No, I have said above, only H264 decoder and JPEG encoder are supported
in currently Rockchip VA-API driver. And H264 decoder depends on a
Rockchip H264 parser. The rk_v4l2_mix just a branch make that clearly,
it could get what the VA-API doesn't offer from code.
>
>>>
>>> I can help on H264 on a code review basis based on the functional H264
>>> setup I have in-house and codec knowledge, but I cannot provide
>>> implementation in a reasonable timeframe, same for VP8.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Apart of very details of each codec, we have also to state about generic
>>> concerns such as:
>>>
>>> - new pixel format introduction (VP8 => VP8F, H264 => S264,
>>> MPG2 => MG2F, MPG4 => MG4F)
>> I don't think it is necessary.
>
> But currently it is done that way in all patches proposals I have seen
> so far, including rockchip:
> rockchip_decoder_v4l2.c:{VAProfileH264Baseline,V4L2_PIX_FMT_H264_SLICE},
It is Google's idea, it would be removed with new version kernel driver
of mine. Also I don't like multiplanes image format from Google driver.
>
> We have to state about it all together. Seems natural to me to do this
> way instead of device caps.
> Doing so user knows that the driver is based on "Frame API" -so
> additional headers are required to decode input stream- and not
> on "Stream API" -H264 stream can be decoded directly-.
> We should probably use something else then "STREAMING" in the
> capabilities instead of duplicating all the encoding formats (exception
> to H264 byte-stream and H264 AVC, that also applies to streaming
> drivers and there is not easy way to introduce stream-format in the API
> atm). Other then that, this solution works, so it could just be
> considered the right way, I just find it less elegant personally.
I agree with Nicolas.
>
>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Hugues.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [0] [ANN] Codec & Request API Brainstorm meeting Oct 10 & 11
>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg106699.html
>>>
>>> [1] MPEG2 A13 CedarX http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg104823.html
>>>
>>> [1] MPEG4 A13 CedarX http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg104817.html
>>>
>>> [2] MPEG2 STi4xx Delta
>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg106240.html
>>>
>>> [2] MPEG4 STi4xx Delta is also supported but not yet pushed
>>>
>>> [3] VP8 Rockchip RK3288, RK3399? VPU
>>> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/overlays/chromiumos-overlay/+/refs/heads/master/sys-kernel/linux-headers/files/0002-CHROMIUM-v4l-Add-VP8-low-level-decoder-API-controls.patch
>>>
>>>
>>> [4] VP8 Rockchip RK3288 VPU
>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg97997.html
>>>
>>> [5] H264 Rockchip RK3288, RK3399? VPU
>>> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/overlays/chromiumos-overlay/+/refs/heads/master/sys-kernel/linux-headers/files/0001-CHROMIUM-media-headers-Import-V4L2-headers-from-Chro.patch
>>>
>>> [6] H264 Rockchip RK3288 VPU
>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg105095.html
>>>
--
Randy Li
The third produce department
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list