[PATCH 10/13] ARM: dts: exynos: replace to "max-frequecy" instead of "clock-freq-min-max"
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzk at kernel.org
Fri Nov 4 08:04:47 PDT 2016
On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 12:19:49PM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Jaehoon,
>
> Am Freitag, 4. November 2016, 19:21:30 CET schrieb Jaehoon Chung:
> > On 11/04/2016 03:41 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:21:32PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> > >> In drivers/mmc/core/host.c, there is "max-frequency" property.
> > >> It should be same behavior. So Use the "max-frequency" instead of
> > >> "clock-freq-min-max".
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung at samsung.com>
> > >> ---
> > >>
> > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5-eval.dts | 2 +-
> > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5.dtsi | 2 +-
> > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-monk.dts | 2 +-
> > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-rinato.dts | 2 +-
> > >> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > This looks totally independent to rest of patches so it can be applied
> > > separately without any functional impact (except lack of minimum
> > > frequency). Is that correct?
> >
> > You're right. I will split the patches. And will resend.
> > Thanks!
>
> I think what Krzysztof was asking was just if he can simply pick up this patch
> alone, as it does not require any of the previous changes.
>
> Same is true for the Rockchip patches I guess, so we could just take them
> individually into samsung/rockchip dts branches.
Yes, I wanted to get exactly this information. I couldn't find it in
cover letter.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list