[PATCH RESEND] Documentation: devicetree: Clean up gpio-keys example

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber at suse.de> wrote:
> Drop #address-cells and #size-cells, which are not required by the
> gpio-keys binding documentation, as button sub-nodes are not devices.
>
> Reported-by: Julien Chauveau <chauveau.julien at gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber at suse.de>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
> index 21641236c095..1552a11f6786 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
> @@ -34,8 +34,6 @@ Example nodes:
>
>         gpio_keys {
>                         compatible = "gpio-keys";
> -                       #address-cells = <1>;
> -                       #size-cells = <0>;
>                         autorepeat;
>                         button at 21 {

FYI, with "[PATCH] scripts/dtc: Update to upstream version 53bf130b1cdd":
(http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg117206.html) applied:

Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /keyboard/button at 21 has a unit
name, but no reg property

>                                 label = "GPIO Key UP";

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds