[RFC PATCH 1/4] Documentation: mmc: add description for new caps
shawn.lin at rock-chips.com
Wed Jun 22 18:29:31 PDT 2016
在 2016/6/22 23:06, Doug Anderson 写道:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 1:20 AM, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin at rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> Let's add some basic description for cap-no-sdio,
>> cap-no-sd and cap-no-mmc.
>> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin at rock-chips.com>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt
>> index ecc007a..e16d42b 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt
>> @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ Optional properties:
>> - cap-power-off-card: powering off the card is safe
>> - cap-mmc-hw-reset: eMMC hardware reset is supported
>> - cap-sdio-irq: enable SDIO IRQ signalling on this interface
>> +- cap-no-sdio: skip sending sdio cmd during initialization
>> +- cap-no-sd: skip sending sd cmd during initialization
>> +- cap-no-mmc: skip sending mmc cmd during initialization
> In the past it has been determined that the "cap-" prefix is
> unnecessary. Some properties still have "cap-" because of backward
> compatibility reasons, but as I understand it new properties shouldn't
> start with "cap-".
> See <https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2013-June/034664.html>
> for reference.
Really? was that the final decision? I just see Olof complained it but
don't see other comments from dt maintainer or from mmc
Hi Ulf and Rob,
What is your opinion?
More information about the Linux-rockchip