[RESEND PATCH v1 3/4] net: ethernet: arc: Add support emac for RK3036

[Xing Zheng]

OK, I think I will use named structures.

Thanks.

> 在 2016年1月1日，20:55，Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> 写道：
> 
>> On Tuesday 29 December 2015 14:59:59 Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On December 27, 2015 11:22:20 PM PST, Xing Zheng <zhengxing at rock-chips.com> wrote:
>>> The RK3036's GRFs offset are different with RK3066/RK3188, and need to
>>> set
>>> mac TX/RX clock before probe emac.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Xing Zheng <zhengxing at rock-chips.com>
>>> ---
>> <snip>
>>> };
>>> 
>>> static const struct of_device_id emac_rockchip_dt_ids[] = {
>>> -      { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3066-emac", .data =
>>> &emac_rockchip_dt_data[0] },
>>> -      { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3188-emac", .data =
>>> &emac_rockchip_dt_data[1] },
>>> +      { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3036-emac", .data =
>>> &emac_rockchip_dt_data[0] },
>>> +      { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3066-emac", .data =
>>> &emac_rockchip_dt_data[1] },
>>> +      { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3188-emac", .data =
>>> &emac_rockchip_dt_data[2] },
>>>      { /* Sentinel */ }
>> 
>> Food for thought, you might want to use an enum here to index emac_rockchip_dt_data which would be less error prone if you add/remove entries in this structure.
> 
> I would use named structures instead:
> 
> static const struct emac_rockchip_soc_data emac_rk3066_emac_data = {
>    .grf_offset = 0x154,
> };
> 
> static const struct of_device_id emac_rockchip_dt_ids[] = {
>    { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3066-emac", .data = &emac_rk3066_emac_data,
>    ...
> };
> 
>    Armd
> 
>