[PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform
Heiko Stuebner
heiko at sntech.de
Mon Feb 8 14:21:57 PST 2016
Hi Vinod,
Am Montag, 8. Februar 2016, 18:44:19 schrieb Vinod Koul:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:27:04AM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Am Montag, 8. Februar 2016, 08:41:34 schrieb Vinod Koul:
> > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 02:56:54PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
> > > > Hello Vinod,
> > > >
> > > > Is there any chance apply the DMA patches?:-)
> > >
> > > I was waiting for any ACKs on ARM patches before I merge this series.
> >
> > I think the more regular way is for the driver maintainer to take the
> > driver-specific stuff and the devicetree parts going through the
> > specific arm- tree. But if you really want to take the whole series,
> > for patches 4,5,6
> Yes but that causes cross tree dependencies, which looking at this won't
> be a big problem, so I can safely merge dmaengine changes and rest can go
> thru ARM tree.
>
> Typically submitter should say which tree he/she prefers, which was not
> provided..
>
> So, are all okay to merge the entire series thru dmaengine tree or
> independent. I don't mind either
In general I don't mind either solution, but would prefer me taking the 3
"ARM: dts: foo" patches, while the rest would go through your tree.
Main reason is to prevent any possible conflicts with other Rockchip
devicetree additions also going into 4.6 .
Thanks
Heiko
> > - ARM: dts: Add arm, pl330-broken-no-flushp quirk for rk3288 platform
> > - ARM: dts: Add arm, pl330-broken-no-flushp quirk for rk3xxx platform
> > - ARM: dts: add pl330-broken-no-flushp quirk for rk3036 SoCs
> >
> > Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de>
>
> Thanks
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list